Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2023
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Enfermedades Transmitidas Por Alimentos y Otras Enfermedades
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Botulism
          • Clostridium botulinum y El Botulismo
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • E. coli
        • Listeria
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
          • Parásitos y Enfermedades Transmitidas Por los Alimentos
        • Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Listeria
        • Salmonella
          • Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Salmonella
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Aditivos en Productos Cárnicos y Avícolas
        • Agua en Carnes y Aves
        • Ahumar Carnes y Aves
        • Air Fryers and Food Safety
        • Alergias Alimentarias: Los “9 Grandes”
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cocción Versus Seguridad
        • Cocinar en Hornos Microondas
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Cómo Encontrar el Número de Establecimiento del USDA (EST) en el Empaque de Alimentos
        • Cómo las Temperaturas Afectan a los Alimentos
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • El Color de la Carne y Las Aves
        • El Gran Deshielo: Métodos Seguros para Descongelar
        • El Manejo Adecuado de los Alimentos Pedidos Por Correo
        • Entendiendo las Retiradas de Alimentos del Mercado del FSIS
        • Fechas en Productos Alimenticios
        • Food Allergies: The “Big 9”
        • Food Thermometers
        • Freidoras de Aire y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Freír en Grasa y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Glosario de Términos de Empaque
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • Guía del Consumidor Sobre Inocuidad Alimentaria: Tormentas y Huracanes Severos
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importación de Productos Cárnicos, Avícolas y Ovoproductos a Estados Unidos
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • La Cocción En Elevaciones Altas
        • La Congelación Y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • La Limpieza Ayuda a Prevenir Enfermedades Transmitidas Por Los Alimentos
        • Las Ollas de Cocción Lenta y la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Las Sobras de Comida e Inocuidad Alimentaria
        • Lavado de Alimentos: ¿Promueve la Inocuidad Alimentaria?
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Manipulación Adecuada de Alimentos Para Llevar
        • Mantenga los Alimentos Seguros - Conceptos Básicos de Inocuidad Alimentaria
        • Manteniendo Seguros Los Almuerzos En "Bolsas"
        • Materiales de Empaque para Carnes y Aves
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Preguntas Frecuentes Sobre Irradiación y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre la Seguridad Alimentaria Durante un Tailgate
        • Sabores Naturales de Carnes y Aves en las Etiquetas
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
        • Seguridad Alimentaria de Comida No Perecedera
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tabla de Temperatura Interna Mínima Segura
        • Tablas de Cortar
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Termómetros para Alimentos
        • Termómetros para Electrodomésticos
        • Términos de Etiquetado de Carnes y Aves
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Voluntarios Sobre la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Zona de Peligro (40 F - 140 F)
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Refrigeration
          • La Refrigeración y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
      • Meat & Catfish
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Bisonte de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Cabra de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Carne Seca y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Carne de Cerdo Fresca de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Carne de Res de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Carne de Ternera de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Carne en Conserva y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color de la Carne Molida Cocida en Relación Con El Grado De Cocción
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Conejo de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Cordero de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Corned Beef
        • Cuando se Asan “Otras” Carnes para las Fiestas
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • El Jamón y la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • El Tocino y la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • La Carne Molida y la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Las Salchichas “hot dogs” y la Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Los Embutidos y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Venta de Carne a Domicilio
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
        • Yersiniosis y los Chinchulines (Tripas): Consejos Para Protegerlo de Enfermedades Transmitidas Por Alimentos
      • Poultry
        • Happy Thanksgiving!
        • Amarras para las Aves y Otros Accesorios
        • Aves: Baños en Solución, Salmueras y Marinadas
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • El Relleno y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Hablemos Sobre el Pavo: Una Guía Para el Consumidor Sobre Cómo Asar un Pavo de Forma Segura
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • La Etiqueta del Ave Dice “Fresco”
        • La Preparación de Turduckens Requiere un Manejo Adecuado
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Pato y Ganso de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Pavo de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Pavo: Rutas Alternativas Hacia la Mesa
        • Pollo de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Preparación Básica del Pavo: Cocinar De Forma Adecuada
        • Preparación Básica del Pavo: Como Descongelar Seguramente
        • Preparación Básica del Pavo: El Relleno
        • Preparación Básica del Pavo: Manejo de las Comidas Cocidas
        • Procesamiento de Aves: Preguntas y Respuestas
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
        • ¿Es Segura la Carne de Pavo Rosada?
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Huevos en Cascarón De la Granja a la Mesa
        • Ovoproductos e Inocuidad Alimentaria
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Eliminando Olores de Refrigeradores y Congeladores
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Incendios y Seguridad Alimentaria
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
      • FSIS/ORISE Food Safety Fellowship Program
        • Aaron Dudley
        • Lauren Lee
        • Sharon Nieves-Miranda
        • Yesutor Soku
        • Ali Strickland
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Developer Resources
      • Recall API
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2025
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2024
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2023-2025 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
    • FSIS Procurement
    • National Federal Financial Assistance
    • Regulatory Decisions & Non-Retaliation
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
            • BSE Workshops for Small & Very Small Plants
          • FSIS BSE Resources
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • Eligible U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Hong Kong Lamb Export Eligible Establishments
          • Hong Kong Pork Export Eligible Establishments
          • Hong Kong Poultry Export Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Hong Kong Beef Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Humane Interactive Knowledge Exchange (HIKE) Scenarios
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office of Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Payment Options & Information
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Who Works for Us
      • Stephanie Galvan Prioritizes Excellence in FSIS
      • Yolanda Kennedy-Edwards: Compassion and Continuous Improvement to Catapult Change
      • Arsalan “AJ” Jalisi Enhances Decision-Making and Engagement with Data Analytics
      • Archives
    • Hiring Paths
      • Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
      • Professionals with Disabilities
      • Student Employment Programs
      • Externships and Volunteer Opportunities
    • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
    • Publications
    • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Performance Management
    • Forms
    • Understanding Your Benefits
    • FSIS Safety
      • HPAI (H5N1) Information
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding and Offboarding
      • Employees Separating from FSIS
      • New Hire Training
      • Exit Interview Guide
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
      • 2024 Under Secretary’s Awards and Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Ceremony
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • June 2025 Snapshots
        • May 2025 Snapshots
        • April 2025 Snapshots
        • March 2025 Snapshots
        • January 2025 Snapshots
        • December 2024 Snapshots
        • November 2024 Snapshots
        • October 2024 Snapshots
        • September 2024 Snapshots
        • August 2024 Snapshots
        • July 2024 Snapshots
        • June 2024 Snapshots
        • May 2024 Snapshots
        • April 2024 Snapshots
        • March 2024 Snapshots
        • February 2024 Snapshots
        • January 2024 Snapshots
        • December 2023 Snapshots
        • November 2023 Snapshots
        • October 2023 Snapshots
        • September 2023 Snapshots
        • August 2023 Snapshots
        • July 2023 Snapshots
        • June 2023 Snapshots
        • May 2023 Snapshots
        • April 2023 Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: Professional Development and Education Benefits as a Recruitment Tool
        • ARCHIVE: Improved PHIS Task Distributor Comes Online!
        • ARCHIVE: Reflections on a Changing Paradigm: World Veterinary Day
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS at Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Conference
        • ARCHIVE: The Power of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs: Resolving Workplace Conflicts Efficiently
        • ARCHIVE: Third FSIS International Meat, Poultry and Egg Products Inspection Seminar Held in Santiago, Chile
        • ARCHIVE: Supervisors Make All the Difference!
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month — Workplace Violence: Active Shooter
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Emergency Alerts
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Professional Development Opportunities
    • Leave Share Programs
      • Leave Bank Program
      • Voluntary Leave Transfer Program
      • Emergency Leave Transfer Program
      • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: FreshRealm Recalls Chicken Fettuccine… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2023-2025 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
    • FSIS Procurement
    • National Federal Financial Assistance
    • Regulatory Decisions & Non-Retaliation
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Verifying Poultry Slaughter Establishments Maintain Adequate Procedures for Preventing Contamination with Feces and Enteric Pathogens

FSIS directive 6420.5
Series Type 6000 Series: Slaughter Inspection
Issue Date Oct 17, 2016
Full Directive
6420.5.pdf

DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS DIRECTIVE UNTIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2016.

  1. PURPOSE
    This directive instructs inspection program personnel (IPP) how to verify that establishments effectively prevent contamination of poultry carcasses (other than ratites) throughout the slaughter and dressing operation as required in 9 CFR 381.65(f) and (g). This directive contains instructions previously found in FSIS Notice 64-14, Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection: Verifying an Establishment’s Procedures for Preventing Contamination by Enteric Pathogens and Fecal Material, and FSIS Directive 6410.3 Verifying Sanitary Dressing and Process Control Procedures by Off-Line Inspection Program Personnel (IPP) in Poultry Slaughter Operations. FSIS will no longer assign the Poultry Sanitary Dressing Verification task in the Public Health Information System (PHIS). This directive also supersedes instructions relating to poultry fecal contamination verification (Chapters III., IV., and V.) of FSIS Directive 6420.2, Verification of Procedures for Controlling Fecal Material, Ingesta and Milk Contamination. Lastly, this directive clarifies that the recordkeeping and sampling requirements in 9 CFR 381.65(g) are applicable to poultry establishments that slaughter under a religious exemption.

    KEY POINTS:
     

    • Verifying establishments prevent contamination with feces and enteric pathogens throughout the slaughter process as part of the slaughter HACCP system
    • Verifying establishments meet zero tolerance requirements for feces on poultry carcasses entering chilling system
    • Reviewing poultry slaughter establishment sampling results
  2. CANCELLATION

    FSIS Directive 6410.3, Verifying Sanitary Dressing and Process Control Procedures by Off-Line Inspection Program Personnel (IPP) in Poultry Slaughter Operations, 7/17/12
  3. BACKGROUND

    1. 9 CFR 381.65(f) requires all establishments that slaughter poultry other than ratites to develop, implement, and maintain written procedures to ensure that poultry carcasses contaminated with visible fecal material do not enter the chiller.
    2. 9 CFR 381.65(g) requires establishments that slaughter poultry other than ratites to develop, implement, and maintain written procedures to prevent contamination with enteric pathogens and feces throughout the slaughter process. FSIS verifies that establishments implement procedures to prevent contamination, rather than relying only on reconditioning and reprocessing procedures at the end of the line to remove contamination which could have been prevented earlier. Because any digestive tract contents can be a source of enteric pathogens, FSIS establishments are required to implement slaughter practices designed to prevent contamination with feces and ingesta throughout the slaughter process.
    3. 9 CFR 381.65(g) also requires poultry slaughter establishments to determine which microbial organisms will be effective in monitoring process control and implement their own sampling plans, specifically for enteric pathogens and fecal contamination. An establishment may test for generic E. coli, as was previously required, as its indicator organism in its sampling procedures if the establishment determines such testing is effective for monitoring its ability to maintain process control.

    4. The regulations require poultry slaughter establishments to incorporate the above written procedures into their Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan or Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (Sanitation SOP) or other prerequisite program. The HACCP plan, Sanitation SOP, and prerequisite programs together are also called the “HACCP system”. Establishments may elect to respond to all of the requirements (9 CFR 381.65(f), (g), and (h)) in one written program or in separate programs in their HACCP system. However, as outlined in 81 FR 7289, if an establishment produces product associated with an outbreak or has failed to meet a pathogen reduction performance standard for Salmonella or Campylobacter and has not addressed those hazards in its HACCP plan, the establishment would need to reassess its HACCP plan for that product to determine whether the HACCP plan needs to be modified to address the hazard (9 CFR 417.3(b)). Thus, the establishment, to maintain an adequate HACCP system, will have to address the pathogen in its HACCP plan, rather than through a prerequisite program like the Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures.

    5. The above requirements in 9 CFR 381.65(f), (g), and (h), including the recordkeeping and sampling requirements, apply to poultry establishments that slaughter poultry under any of the exemptions based on religious dietary laws in 9 CFR 381.11 through 9 CFR 381.14.

  4. VERIFYING THAT ESTABLISHMENTS PREVENT CONTAMINATION BY ENTERIC PATHOGENS AND FECAL MATERIAL THROUGHOUT ENTIRE SLAUGHTER AND DRESSING OPERATION

    1. IPP are to verify that an establishment meets the requirements of 9 CFR 381.65(f) and (g) to prevent contamination with enteric pathogens and feces throughout the slaughter operation in two main ways, which are described further below:
      1. ​​​​​​IPP are to perform the Poultry Zero Tolerance task to verify that the establishment’s HACCP system is preventing carcasses contaminated with feces from entering the chilling system. (See Section V below.)
      2. When IPP verify the establishment’s food safety system meets HACCP requirements in accordance with the instructions in FSIS Directive 5000.1, Verifying an Establishment’s Food Safety System, they are to verify that the establishment implements the written programs required by 9 CFR 381.65(f) and 381.65(g) effectively to prevent contamination with feces and other sources of enteric pathogens. IPP are also to verify that the establishment meets the applicable recordkeeping requirements of 9 CFR 381.65(h). IPP are also to review the results of the establishment’s microbiological sampling program as part of this verification. (See Section VI below.)
    2. IPP are to document any regulatory noncompliances they observe during these verification activities as described in Section VII below.
    3. IPP are also to consider their findings from these two verification activities together with other findings to evaluate whether the establishment is effectively implementing the components of its HACCP system to ensure that poultry are slaughtered under sanitary conditions. If the overall pattern of inspection findings suggest that the establishment is not maintaining sanitary conditions throughout the slaughter process, IPP are to consult with their supervisor as described in Section VII, G below.
  5. VERIFYING THAT ESTABLISHMENTS PREVENT CARCASSES CONTAMINATED WITH FECES FROM ENTERING THE CHILLING SYSTEM

    1. IPP assigned to establishments that operate under any poultry slaughter inspection systems are to perform scheduled and unscheduled Poultry Zero Tolerance Verification tasks as described below to verify that the establishment is preventing carcasses with fecal material from entering the chiller (9 CFR 381.65(f)).
      1. Each day, IPP are to conduct at least two (eight for NPIS) fecal contamination checks for each evisceration line for every shift (i.e., the number of checks per day will total at least 2 x number of shifts x number of lines) and as scheduled by the Public Health Veterinarian (PHV). IPP are to schedule directed tasks in PHIS as needed above the routine number of Poultry Zero Tolerance Verification Tasks assigned by PHIS to document the correct number of fecal contamination checks each shift.
      2. Each fecal contamination check by IPP consists of selecting and examining 10 poultry carcasses after the final wash and before the chilling tank, to verify that the establishment’s process produces product free of visible fecal contamination. Results of the checks help determine whether the written procedures for preventing carcasses with feces 9 CFR 381.65(f) from entering the chiller are effective.

      3. IPP are to examine each 10-bird sample set at the pre-chill re-inspection station using the inspection procedure in Attachment 1 to examine each carcass. To ensure consistency, IPP are to identify feces according to the identification guidelines for feces in Attachment 1.

      4. If IPP observe feces on any of the 10 birds in a set, IPP are to notify the establishment and document noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(f) as described in Section VII below.

      5. If IPP observe ingesta on a carcass during the fecal contamination check, IPP are to notify establishment personnel and verify that the ingesta is removed from the affected carcass. IPP are not to document noncompliance for this finding. However, IPP are to consider the possible sources of the ingesta contamination when performing the additional verification activities below.

  6. VERIFYING THE ESTABLISHMENT’S WRITTEN PROGRAMS TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION WITH FECES AND ENTERIC PATHOGENS

    1. IPP are to verify that establishments maintain and implement written programs to prevent contamination of carcasses with feces and enteric pathogens throughout the slaughter process, as required by 9 CFR 381.65(f) and (g). IPP are to be aware of how the establishment has included such written programs in its HACCP system and verify implementation of those programs when performing the applicable food safety verification tasks – either Slaughter HACCP Verification or Operational Sanitation SOP Verification tasks in accordance with the instructions in FSIS Directive 5000.1.
    2. IPP are to observe the slaughter operation and establishment records to verify that the establishment’s slaughter process is in control and preventing contamination with feces or ingesta. IPP are to verify that the establishment’s procedures are not regularly or systematically allowing contamination to occur. IPP are also to consider recent findings during FSIS verification activities or establishment monitoring procedures that might suggest that increased contamination could be occurring in a certain location in the slaughter process and pay particular attention to those possible sources of contamination when observing establishment operations. If IPP observe potential insanitary conditions other than contamination with feces or ingesta, they are to refer to the instructions on verifying sanitation regulatory requirements in Chapter II of FSIS Directive 5000.1. When they observe the slaughter operation, IPP are to:
      1. Observe carcasses at various points on the slaughter line for evidence of frequent or recurring contamination with visible ingesta or feces;

      2. Observe the contact surfaces and operation of establishment equipment (e.g., venter, opener) to verify the equipment appears to be adjusted correctly for the bird size or other factors and is not routinely contributing to fecal and or ingesta contamination of the carcasses;

      3. Observe establishment employees to verify that they are consistently preventing contamination of carcasses during dressing tasks and that they respond appropriately to correct visible contamination when it does occur;

      4. Observe establishment employees implementing the procedures for preventing contamination with enteric pathogens and feces, including any monitoring, recordkeeping, or sampling activities that the establishment uses to document control of contamination during the slaughter process; and

      5. Verify that establishments use reconditioning, reprocessing, or antimicrobial intervention treatments effectively to address any contamination that occurs during the slaughter process.

    3. IPP are to review establishment microbiological sampling records to verify that the establishment:

      1. Collects and analyzes microbiological samples as described in its written sampling program;

      2. Meets sampling locations and frequencies requirements of 9 CFR 381.65(g);

      3. Considers the overall levels of microbial contamination as well as the reduction in contamination between pre- and post-chill as indicators of process control;

      4. Uses microbiological sampling results to monitor its ability to maintain process control as required in 9 CFR 381.65(g). IPP are to verify that establishments monitor and assess sampling results at pre- and post-chill locations;

      5. Takes actions to restore or improve process control when sampling results indicate problems with establishment’s slaughter HACCP system; and

      6. Maintains daily records documenting the implementation and monitoring of its procedures to prevent contamination by enteric pathogens and fecal material throughout the slaughter process including records documenting the results of its sampling plan (9 CFR 381.65(h)). IPP are to verify that the establishment’s test results are recorded in a manner that allows the analysis of test results to determine process control over time and identify situations that may indicate a loss of control. IPP are to verify that the establishment:

        1. Makes these records available for IPP to review and retains these records for one year; and

        2. Implements appropriate controls to ensure integrity of electronic data if records are maintained on computers.

    4. When reviewing establishment sampling results, IPP are to consider that a well-controlled process will normally show small to moderate variation around the desired result over time and may occasionally produce results well outside the normal range through random statistical variation. However, trends in sampling results that indicate increasing variation or rising contamination levels can be signs that the establishment is not maintaining process control. IPP are to look for trends such as:

      1. Sampling results exceed the establishment’s normal variation or upper control limit by a relatively large amount several times in quick succession. This may indicate rare but significant variations from the normal performance of the establishment’s system that overwhelm the control measures in place.

      2. Sampling results begin to regularly exceed the establishment’s normal variation or upper control limit by a relatively small amount. This may indicate frequent or ongoing loss of control in one part of the establishment’s slaughter system that is partially compensated for by controls in other parts of the system. Alternately, this could indicate systemic changes which reduce the overall effectiveness of the establishment’s system.

      3. Sampling results show a trend of rising contamination over a relatively long period of time.
        Normal seasonal or weather-related changes can produce trends of more or less contamination on incoming birds, which may be reflected in establishment sampling results. However, if microbiological contamination increases from previous years or begins to deviate from an establishment’s established seasonal pattern, this may indicate gradual decline of system effectiveness over time.

      4. Other sampling programs begin to show significantly worse results. These could include FSIS carcass sampling results or FSIS or establishment sampling results from downstream products such as poultry parts and comminuted poultry products that originate from the establishment’s slaughtered carcasses. Abnormal results of these other sampling programs may indicate that increased contamination is occurring during slaughter.

        NOTE: Establishment sampling results, by themselves, do not necessarily indicate noncompliance as long as records indicate that the establishment takes effective action to maintain or restore process control when required.
         

    5. If IPP have questions about whether the establishment’s records indicate it is maintaining process control, IPP should consult their supervisor.

    6. If IPP observe that the establishment’s written programs do not meet the requirements described above or the establishment’s slaughter process is not consistently preventing carcasses or parts from becoming contaminated with feces or ingesta, they are to document noncompliance as described in Section VII below.

  7. DOCUMENTING NONCOMPLIANCE

    1. IPP are to consider their findings from the verification tasks described above in the overall context of the establishment’s control of the slaughter process and the effectiveness of the establishment’s programs to prevent carcasses from becoming contaminated with feces or enteric pathogens during slaughter.
    2. If IPP observe feces on a carcass during the Poultry Zero Tolerance task, they are to:
      1. Document noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(f) and consider whether the noncompliance is associated with any previous noncompliances according to the instructions in Chapter V of FSIS Directive 5000.1;
      2. Perform a Slaughter HACCP Verification task to verify that the establishment performs corrective actions for the affected product in accordance with 9 CFR 417.3(a);
    3. IPP are to document noncompliance with the applicable Sanitation SOP requirements in 9 CFR 416 or HACCP requirements in 9 CFR 417 if they observe that:
      1. Establishment employees are not implementing the establishment’s procedures to prevent contamination, including sampling procedures, as written;

      2. The establishment does not have records to document the implementation and monitoring of its procedures;

      3. The establishment does not respond to findings of visible fecal contamination or sampling results as described in their HACCP plan, Sanitation SOPs or other prerequisite program; or

      4. The establishment does not perform and document corrective actions when they identify product that has become contaminated with feces or ingesta.

    4. IPP are to document noncompliance with the applicable regulatory citation from 9 CFR 381.65 if they observe that:

      1. The establishment has not developed written procedures to prevent carcasses contaminated with feces from entering the chilling system or has not incorporated those procedures into the HACCP system (381.65(f)); or

      2. The establishment has not developed written procedures to prevent carcasses from becoming contaminated with feces or enteric pathogens throughout the slaughter process, if those procedures do not include microbiological sampling, or if the establishment has not incorporated those procedures into the HACCP system (381.65(g)).

    5. Using the appropriate PHIS task based on how the establishment has incorporated its procedures in its HACCP system to prevent or minimize contamination by enteric pathogens or fecal contamination at steps throughout slaughter operations, i.e., HACCP, or Sanitation SOP task as outlined in FSIS Directive 5000.1, IPP are to document noncompliance (citing the regulation in parentheses below) if they observe that:

      1. The establishment is not properly implementing its written procedures (381.65(g));

      2. The establishment does not have necessary support for its sampling program to show that its testing is effective to determine whether the system is preventing pathogens (417.5(a)(1));

      3. The establishment does not include support for testing for indicator organisms (417.5(a)(1));

      4. The establishment is not, at a minimum, conducting microbiological sampling at the required location or frequency according to the establishment’s size and production volume (381.65(g));

      5. The establishment does not maintain sample integrity, (e.g. randomness and handling of samples) (381.65(g));

      6. The establishment is not maintaining daily records to document the implementation and monitoring of its written procedures (381.65(h));

      7. The establishment does not make records available for FSIS access or does not retain records for one year (381.65(h)); and

      8. If the establishment does not conduct corrective actions to address findings of visible fecal contamination as required by HACCP (9 CFR 417.3), Sanitation-SOPs (9 CFR 416.15) or other prerequisite program (9 CFR 417.5).

    6. If IPP observe that the establishment’s slaughter process is regularly allowing feces or ingesta to contaminate carcasses, they are to:

      1. Document noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(g) and consider whether the noncompliance is associated with any previous noncompliances according to the instructions in Chapter V of FSIS Directive 5000.1;

      2. Perform the appropriate food safety verification task (HACCP or Sanitation SOP) to verify that the establishment performs corrective actions for the affected product in accordance with 9 CFR 417.3 or 9 CFR 416.15;

      3. Consider the establishment’s identified cause for this and other recent contamination findings and observe establishment operations at those specific points during subsequent verification tasks to verify the establishment’s corrective actions have been effective to restore process control; and

    7.  IPP are to consider whether the overall pattern of inspection findings suggests that the establishment is not maintaining sanitary conditions throughout the slaughter HACCP system. For example, if an establishment has repetitive associated HACCP or SSOP noncompliances for multiple aspects of the slaughter system, or if the establishment’s corrective actions in response to findings of visible fecal contamination are consistently ineffective, it may indicate systemic problems with the establishment’s slaughter HACCP system, and may indicate that the establishment is slaughtering poultry under insanitary conditions. IPP are to discuss such situations with their immediate supervisor to evaluate the need to take an enforcement action as described in FSIS Directive 5000.1, Chapter V.

  8. QUESTIONS
    IPP are to refer questions regarding this directive to their supervisor. Follow up questions regarding the verification of written procedures to prevent visible fecal material throughout the slaughter operations can be sent to the Policy Development Staff (PDS) through askFSIS. Refer follow up questions regarding verification of microbiological testing procedures to the Risk and Innovations Management Staff (RIMS) through askFSIS. PDS and RIMS can also be reached by telephone at 1-800-233-3935.

    When submitting a question through askFSIS, use the Submit a Question tab, and enter the following information in the fields provided:

    Subject Field:    Enter FSIS Directive 6420.5
    Question Field: Enter your question being sure to include as much detail as possible.

    For questions regarding verification of preventing fecal material contamination:
    Product Field:     Select PDD General from the drop-down menu Category Field:   Select Slaughter/Poultry from the drop-down menu

    For questions regarding microbiological testing procedures:

    Product Field:    Select Sampling from the drop-down menu. Category Field:                      Select General from the drop-down menu
    Policy Arena:      Select Domestic (U.S.) only from the drop-down menu

    When all fields are complete, press Continue and at the next screen press Finish Submitting Question.

    NOTE: Refer to FSIS Directive 5620.1, Using askFSIS, for additional information on submitting questions.

Attachment 1 - Inspection Procedure for Examining Carcasses Offline
Attachment 2 - Identification of Feces for Poultry

(Note: Download PDF for complete information)

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
  • Significant Guidance
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
  • Whistleblower Protection Coordinator

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions