Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Residue Chemistry
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
          • Questions and Answers Concerning the Recently Published Generic Labeling Final Rule
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professional with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights
    • Employee News & Stories
    • FSIS Snapshots
      • January 2023 Snapshots
      • December 2022 Snapshots
      • September 2022 Snapshots
      • August 2022 Snapshots
      • November 2022 Snapshots
      • July 2022 Snapshots
      • October 2022 Snapshots
      • June 2022 Snapshots
      • May 2022 Snapshots
      • April 2022 Snapshots
      • March 2022 Snapshots
      • February 2022 Snapshots
      • January 2022 Snapshots
      • December 2021 Snapshots
      • November 2021 Snapshots
      • October 2021 Snapshots
      • September 2021 Snapshots
      • August 2021 Snapshots
      • July 2021 Snapshots
      • June 2021 Snapshots
    • Submit Your Stories
    • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
    • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
    • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
    • Archives
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
      • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
      • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
      • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
      • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
      • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
      • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
      • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
      • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
      • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
      • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
      • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
      • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
      • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
      • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
      • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
      • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
      • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
      • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
      • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
      • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
      • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
      • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
      • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
      • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
      • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
      • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
      • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
      • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Conagra Brands Recalls Canned Meat and… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Verifying an Establishment's Food Safety System - Revision 7

FSIS directive 5000.1
Series Type 5,000 Series: Program Services
Issue Date Oct 27, 2022
Full Directive
5000.1.pdf

View Informational Dashboard

NOTE: DO NOT IMPLEMENT THE HACCP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EGG PRODUCTS ESTABLISHMENTS UNTIL OCTOBER 31, 2022.

CHAPTER I - GENERAL

  1. PURPOSE
    1. This directive provides comprehensive instructions to inspection program personnel (IPP) in meat, poultry, and egg products establishments on how they are to protect the public health by properly verifying an establishment’s compliance with the pathogen reduction, sanitation, and the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulations. This directive has been revised to incorporate instructions to IPP related to HACCP requirements in egg products, the revised regulations under the Rules of Practice for egg products and clarifying instructions for IPP in establishments that do not have critical control points or a HACCP plan. In addition, Chapter IV – Pathogen Reduction Activities has been revised to reflect changes due to the implementation of the Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection rule (79 FR 49566) and the Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection rule (83 FR 4780). Additional technical corrections have been made to remove obsolete title references, update regulatory citations for the Thermally Processed, Commercially Sterile Rule (81 FR 17338), and to add one citation to an example for Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (Sanitation SOPs).


      NOTE: In this directive, the term IPP refers to consumer safety inspectors (CSIs) and public health veterinarians (PHVs).
    2. IPP stationed at official import establishments are to refer only to the chapters of this directive as they relate to Sanitation Performance Standards (SPS), Sanitation SOPs, and documentation/enforcement. IPP at official import inspection establishments are NOT to perform the verification activities in Chapter III- HACCP or Chapter IV- Pathogen Reduction Activities. The following chapters are applicable to inspection procedures at official import establishments:
      • Chapter I - General
      • Chapter II - Sanitation
      • Chapter V - Documentation and Enforcement
      • Chapter VI - Rules of Practice
    3. IPP are to note that in the Public Health Information System (PHIS) and throughout this directive, they will see the term “establishment” used for egg products plants.

      Key Points: 
      • Provides IPP instructions for verification of SPS, Sanitation SOP, and HACCP regulatory requirements in PHIS.

      • Defines and outlines the components of an establishment’s HACCP system.

      • Provides instructions for IPP at official import inspection establishments to verify Sanitation SOPs and SPS requirements.

      • Provides IPP instructions for documentation of HACCP system verification results.

  2. CANCELLATION
    FSIS Directive 5000.1, Rev. 6, Verifying an Establishment’s Food Safety System, 10/14/2021
  3. BACKGROUND
    1. On October 29, 2020, FSIS published a final rule on egg products inspection: Egg Products Inspection Regulations (85 FR 68640).85 FR 68640). Provisions related to the implementation of the Sanitation SOPs and other sanitation requirements became effective on October 29, 2021, and provisions related to the implementation of HACCP systems become effective on October 31, 2022. 
    2. Section 608 of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA), Section 456 of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA), and Section 1035 of the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) authorize the Secretary to require establishments to be maintained and operated in such a sanitary manner to prevent adulterated products from entering commerce.
    3. Based on the authority of the FMIA, PPIA, and EPIA, FSIS applies the official mark of inspection to products that Agency IPP find are not adulterated. To produce unadulterated product, establishments are to implement a food safety system that includes assessing what food safety hazards are reasonably likely to occur in the establishment’s production process, maintaining conditions to produce a safe product, and maintaining controls necessary to prevent the development of hazards during the operation of the establishment.
    4. To achieve these results, the establishment needs to have a validated food safety system. The food safety system that the regulations require is HACCP. A HACCP system consists of the following components:
      1. A flow chart describing the steps in each process and product flow;

      2. The hazard analysis with its supporting documentation; and

      3. The HACCP plans the establishment implements to control food safety hazards identified as reasonably likely to occur.

    5. The regulations also require that the establishment maintain Sanitation SOPs and meet the SPS requirements. Sanitation SOPs are a prerequisite to the HACCP plan, and the establishment may use Sanitation SOPs to support decisions in the hazard analysis that certain hazards are not reasonably likely to occur. Establishments may also maintain other prerequisite programs to support decisions in their hazard analysis.
  4. COMMUNICATING WITH ESTABLISHMENT MANAGEMENT
    When IPP rotate into an assignment or when IPP are newly assigned to an establishment, they are to review the establishment’s history, which is reflected in the establishment’s home page in PHIS. If IPP have questions or concerns about the establishment’s history, they are to consult with the frontline supervisor (FLS). IPP are to be familiar with the following elements of the establishment’s history:
    1. PHIS records of recent noncompliances including the corrective and preventive measures that the establishment provided to address the noncompliances;

    2. The results of any recent or ongoing FSIS verification sampling activities from the PHIS establishment home page;

    3. The findings and outcomes from the most recent Food Safety Assessment conducted at the establishment; and

    4. If an enforcement action has been deferred or if a suspension has been held in abeyance at the establishment, the Agency’s expectations, as described in the verification plan, and the results of the Agency’s findings from verifying the effectiveness of the corrective and preventive measures that were proffered by the establishment. IPP are also to become familiar with the conditions that led the Agency to bring the enforcement action that has been deferred or resulted in the suspension that is in abeyance.

  5. ENTRANCE MEETING
    1. When IPP rotate into an assignment or conduct an inspection at an establishment for the first time, they are to:
      1. Review the establishment’s Sanitation SOPs, HACCP plan, and prerequisite programs;

      2. Review the establishment profile in PHIS to become familiar with the information in the profile. As IPP become familiar with the establishment operations, they are to update the PHIS establishment profile appropriately;

      3. Have an entrance meeting (at the first weekly meeting) with the establishment management to familiarize themselves with the establishment and inquire about the specific operations of that establishment. Also, if IPP have questions based on their review of the programs, they are to ask these questions at the meeting; and

      4. Take notes at the entrance meeting and document the notes in a Memorandum of Interview (MOI) and provide a copy to the establishment.

    2. IPP are to ask establishment management about the location of the applicable records and the local arrangements for FSIS personnel to access and review the records. Establishments are required to provide access to records needed by IPP to perform their duties. However, IPP are to review the necessary records in the location specified by establishment management. IPP are not to maintain any copies of the establishment’s written programs or data from such programs in the inspection office.
    3. IPP are to ask about any previously agreed upon notification (i.e., when IPP notify plant management to allow the establishment sufficient time to hold product) when Agency sampling is performed at the establishment. IPP need to know this information so that an establishment can properly control sampled product pending FSIS test results.
    4. In addition to the MOI, PHIS has a separate ‘Meeting Agenda’ feature that allows IPP to document notes or concerns for meetings with establishment management. IPP may use this feature to generate an agenda for the weekly meeting. This feature will help ensure that all appropriate issues are covered and documented.
  6. WEEKLY MEETING
    1. IPP are to have weekly meetings with establishment management to discuss issues of concern. The meetings may involve discussing individual noncompliance, developing trends of noncompliance, findings on the part of IPP that show compliance but warrant discussion, or other topics that arise. IPP may use the PHIS Inspection Verification ‘Meeting Agenda’ feature to prepare the meeting agenda. IPP are to share a copy of the meeting agenda with establishment management when requested. In addition, establishment management may wish to share information or concerns at the weekly meetings. See FSIS Directive 5010.1, Food Safety Related Topics for Discussion During Weekly Meetings with Establishment Management, for suggested topics for weekly meetings.

      NOTE: IPP have access to an ‘Inspection Notes’ feature in PHIS that allows inspectors to capture information in between weekly meetings that can be included in the meeting agenda and used to create the MOI. IPP are not to use the MOI as a means to document daily conversations with establishment employees.
    2. On a periodic basis, about once a month as scheduled using the PHIS ‘Update Establishment Profile’ task, IPP are to ask establishment management at the weekly meeting whether it has made any changes in the production process or other changes that could affect the safety of the product. If IPP learn that establishment management has made a change in its process, based on the nature of the change, IPP are to perform the appropriate verification activities outlined in this directive. If IPP are unsure how to proceed, they are to contact their supervisor for guidance. IPP are to update the applicable sections of the establishment profile in PHIS as necessary to ensure that it accurately reflects establishment’s operations and programs. See FSIS Directive 5300.1, Managing the Establishment Profile in the Public Health Information System, for instructions on maintaining the establishment profile.
    3. IPP are to take notes at the weekly meetings and may document the notes in an MOI generated from the meeting agenda feature in PHIS. The MOI is to include the date of the meeting, who was at the meeting, and details about the specific topics discussed including answers to any questions asked during the meeting. IPP are to provide establishment management with a copy of the MOI. If after the establishment receives their copy of the MOI, it objects to anything written in the MOI, IPP are to follow the instructions in FSIS Directive 5010.1. IPP are to attach any documents provided by the establishment in the weekly meeting and reference the attachment in the MOI.
  7. GENERAL PHIS VERIFICATION THOUGHT PROCESS
    1. When conducting any of the verification activities in this directive, IPP are to follow this thought process:
      1. Gather all available information;
      2. Assess the significance and meaning of the information gathered;

      3. Determine whether the information supports a finding of regulatory compliance; and

      4. Put it all together and document “findings” in PHIS.

    2. To gather all available information, IPP need to be aware that each verification task in this directive requires that they verify that the establishment complies with certain regulatory requirements. When IPP perform each verification task, they are to begin by collecting information that will help them determine whether the establishment is meeting the applicable regulatory requirements. In order to gather the appropriate information, IPP are to do the following: 
      1. Review establishment programs and supporting documentation;
      2. Review establishment records documenting implementation of its programs;

      3. Observe establishment employees implementing the establishment’s programs and procedures;

      4. Observe the conditions in the establishment; and

      5. Observe product and occasionally take measurements as specified in the establishment programs.

    3. To assess the significance and meaning of the information gathered, IPP are to consider what each piece of information, either taken separately or with other findings, says about how the food safety system is functioning to ensure that products are safe and wholesome (not adulterated). IPP are also to consider information they have gathered in the context of past findings and to look for any patterns or trends in the findings. IPP are to consider the following:
      1. Are conditions in the establishment getting worse over time?
      2. Are the same or similar problems occurring repeatedly or consistently occurring on a seasonal basis?

      3. Is the establishment responding effectively and in a timely manner to problems that do arise?

    4. To determine whether the information supports a finding of regulatory compliance, IPP are to decide, based on all the available information, whether one of the following findings emerges from the evidence:
      1. That the establishment is not maintaining sanitary conditions;
      2. That the establishment has produced or shipped adulterated products;

      3. The establishment’s food safety system is not effectively controlling the relevant food safety hazard; and

      4. That the establishment is not meeting the requirements in one or more regulations.

    5. If IPP are uncertain whether the information supports a particular determination, they are to discuss the issue with their immediate supervisor.
    6. To put it all together, it is important that IPP consider each piece of information in the context of the food safety system. For example, IPP may identify many minor concerns regarding the hazard analysis. Each one, by itself, may not be sufficient to determine noncompliance, but considered together in the context of the establishment’s total system, the concerns may indicate that there is a potential systemic problem. Thus, each finding should be evaluated for what it shows regarding the effectiveness of the food safety system and the potential for developing product adulteration. At the end of the process, IPP are to document their findings in PHIS.
    7. The following questions will help IPP to consider the significance of each finding for the food safety system:
      1. Is this piece of information part of a pattern?

        EXAMPLE: If the establishment missed a measurement for a prerequisite program, is this an isolated incident, or does the establishment regularly fail to implement prerequisite procedures in its food safety system?
      2. Is there other information to indicate that the system is working or is not working?

        EXAMPLE: An establishment’s prerequisite program for received products requires that they come with certificates of analysis (COA) from suppliers, as well as periodic testing of incoming product. If the establishment failed to receive a COA for a particular product, how did the establishment respond in its decisions on whether to use the product?
      3. Does the information seem to agree with the other available information about the food safety system?

        EXAMPLE: The establishment uses a prerequisite program to support that a hazard is not reasonably likely to occur in incoming products, and the records associated with the incoming products appear to show that the particular hazard is being prevented. The establishment’s testing of finished product for the hazard finds positive results.
      4. Do these results support each other or is there an apparent contradiction?

        In the above example, if the establishment is finding positive results for pathogens, what has it identified as the cause if it has determined that the hazard is not reasonably likely to occur?
    8. When IPP document noncompliance related to the hazard analysis, supporting documentation, and prerequisite programs, they are to describe why the findings led them to a determination of noncompliance.
    9. Many establishments have developed unique and complicated food safety systems. FSIS understands that IPP will not always be able to determine the significance of their findings. When IPP have concerns about the establishment’s hazard analysis but are unable to determine whether their findings constitute noncompliance, they should discuss their concerns with their supervisor.
    10. The safety of meat, poultry, and egg products depends on establishments developing and implementing effective food safety systems. IPP are in the best position to identify concerns about the effectiveness of an establishment’s food safety system because they are familiar with the daily operations and actual conditions in the establishment. By identifying concerns about the hazard analysis, supporting documentation, or prerequisite programs, IPP are acting to protect the public health by preventing products that present a risk from entering commerce.
    11. If IPP have concerns that there are systemic problems with the establishment’s food safety system, or that there is reason to believe that product may have become adulterated, IPP are to bring these issues to the attention of their supervisor immediately.
  8. SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES
    1. The supervisor plays a key role in ensuring that decisions made by IPP are consistent with FSIS statutory authority and Agency policy, and that duties are performed in accordance with prescribed inspection methods and procedures addressed in this directive.
    2. FSIS supervisory personnel are to engage in discussion with IPP about their findings related to the establishment’s HACCP system. Supervisors are to assist IPP with concerns raised about establishment documentation and prerequisite programs that support decisions in the hazard analysis and assist IPP in making supportable decisions about whether the establishment documentation meets the requirements of 9 CFR 417.5(a)(1).
    3. Supervisors are to discuss how establishment testing results and other data that may not explicitly be part of the establishment’s critical control points (CCPs) or prerequisite programs might influence IPP’s thought process regarding the effectiveness of an establishment’s HACCP system. Supervisors are to assist IPP in considering an establishment’s hazard analysis, prerequisite programs, HACCP plans, Sanitation SOPs, and other programs in an integrated way and discuss ways in which findings in one area may impact other parts of a particular establishment’s HACCP system.
    4. Supervisory personnel are to ensure that IPP are correctly applying the inspection methodology, are making informed decisions, are properly documenting findings, and are taking the appropriate enforcement actions as instructed in this directive.
    5. Supervisory personnel should refer to the current version of the FSIS Guide for Conducting In- Plant Performance System (IPPS) Assessments for additional guidance and instructions.

CHAPTER II - SANITATION

PART I - INTRODUCTION

PART II - SPS

  1. VERIFYING SPS REQUIREMENTS ARE MET UNDER PHIS
  2. GENERAL SPS REGULATIONS
  3. GROUNDS AND PEST CONTROL
  4. CONSTRUCTION
  5. LIGHTING
  6. VENTILATION
  7. PLUMBING AND SEWAGE
  8. WATER SUPPLY AND WATER, ICE, AND SOLUTION REUSE
    • WATER SUPPLY AND USE
    • REUSE OF WATER, ICE, AND SOLUTIONS FOR RTE PRODUCT
    • REUSE OF WATER, ICE, AND SOLUTIONS FOR RAW PRODUCT
  9. DRESSING ROOMS AND LAVATORIES
  10. EQUIPMENT AND UTENSILS
  11. SANITARY OPERATIONS
  12. EMPLOYEE HYGIENE

PART III SANITATION SOPs

  1. SANITATION SOPs
  2. VERIFYING SANITATION SOP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN PHIS
  3. SANITATION SOP OPERATIONAL AND PRE-OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION TASKS
  4. SELECTING EQUIPMENT AND AREAS FOR PRE-OPERATIONAL SANITATION SOP VERIFICATION
  5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF SANITATION SOPs
  6. MAINTENANCE OF SANITATION SOPs
  7. SANITATION SOP CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
  8. SANITATION SOP RECORDKEEPING

CHAPTER III - HACCP

PART I - INTRODUCTION

  1. GENERAL
  2. HAZARD ANALYSIS
  3. IPP VERIFY HACCP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

PART II - VERIFYING HACCP IN PHIS

  1. GENERAL - PERFORMING THE HACCP VERIFICATION TASK
  2. VERIFYING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HACCP PLAN
  3. IPP VERIFICATION OF HACCP IMPLEMENTATION

CHAPTER IV - PATHOGEN REDUCTION ACTIVITIES

  1. TESTING FOR GENERIC E. coli
  2. SAMPLE COLLECTION
  3. SAMPLING FREQUENCY
  4. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
  5. RECORDING OF TEST RESULTS
  6. EVALUATION OF RESULTS

CHAPTER V - DOCUMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT

  1. DOCUMENTING VERIFICATION RESULTS IN PHIS
  2. DOCUMENTING NONCOMPLIANCE
  3. DOCUMENTATION OF SPS VERIFICATION RESULTS
  4. DOCUMENTATION OF SANITATION SOP VERIFICATION RESULTS
  5. DOCUMENTING HACCP VERIFICATION RESULTS
  6. DOCUMENTING GENERIC E. coli VERIFICATION RESULTS
  7. TRENDS OF NONCOMPLIANCE

CHAPTER VI - RULES OF PRACTICE

  1. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
  2. REGULATORY CONTROL ACTION
  3. WITHHOLDING ACTIONS AND SUSPENSIONS (PRIOR NOTIFICATION NOT NECESSARY)
  4. WITHHOLDING ACTION OR A SUSPENSION ACTION (PRIOR NOTIFICATION GIVEN)
  5. NOIE
  6. ABEYANCE
  7. VERIFICATION PLANS
  8. QUESTIONS
    Refer questions regarding this directive to your supervisor or if needed to OPPD through askFSIS or by telephone at 1-800-233-3935. When submitting a question, complete the web form and select General HACCP inquiry type for general HACCP questions, HACCP Deviation & HACCP Validation for questions about pathogen modeling or product dispositions after a critical limit deviation and HACCP validation, or General Inspection Policy for the inquiry type.

NOTE: Refer to FSIS Directive 5620.1, Using askFSIS, for additional information on submitting questions.

For Full Directive 5000.1 Revision 7, please download the PDF version.

Related Media

5000.1-Highlighted.pdf

Directive 5,000.1 - Informational Dashboard

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions