Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professionals with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Elkhorn Valley Packing Recalls Boneless… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Verification of Poultry Good Commercial Practices

FSIS directive 6110.1
Series Type 6,000 Series: Slaughter Inspection
Issue Date Jul 03, 2018
Full Directive
6110.1.pdf
  1. PURPOSE

    This directive is a consolidation of relevant information from Section VII, Verification of Good Commercial Practices for Poultry, of FSIS Directive 6100.3, Ante-mortem and Post-mortem Poultry Inspection and expired FSIS Notice 44-16, Instructions For Writing Poultry Good Commercial Practices Noncompliance Records and Memorandum of Interview Letters For Poultry Mistreatment. The directive provides instructions to inspection program personnel (IPP) for writing a noncompliance record (NR) for noncompliance with the regulations requiring the slaughter of poultry in accordance with Good Commercial Practices (GCP), as well as instructions for composing a Memorandum of Interview (MOI) when documenting a meeting between IPP and establishment management regarding an observation of the mistreatment of live poultry before slaughter.

    KEY POINTS:

    • Provides IPP instructions on how to gather and assess information when verifying poultry GCP
    • Clarifies that video surveillance can be used by the establishment as a form of GCP record
    • Provides instructions on how to properly write GCP NRs and poultry mistreatment MOIs
    • Provides instructions to the District Veterinary Medical Specialist (DVMS) on how to review NRs and MOIs to assess accuracy
  2. BACKGROUND
    1. In poultry operations, following GCP, including the employment of humane methods of handling and slaughtering, increases the likelihood of producing unadulterated product. The Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 453(g)(5)) and the regulations (9 CFR 381.90) provide that poultry carcasses showing evidence of having died from causes other than slaughter are considered adulterated and must be condemned. The regulations (9 CFR 381.65(b)) also require that poultry be slaughtered in accordance with GCP. Poultry are to be slaughtered in a manner that ensures that breathing has stopped before scalding, so that the birds do not drown, and that slaughter results in thorough bleeding of the poultry carcass. Compliance with these requirements helps ensure that poultry are treated humanely. In general, poultry should be handled in a manner that prevents needless injury and suffering in order to produce a commercially marketable product.
    2. If birds hung on the slaughter line die before slaughter because of mishandling, or if birds are being killed in a manner that does not comply with GCP as defined in 9 CFR 381.65(b), the resultant product is adulterated under the PPIA. This includes the treatment of all birds brought onto the official premises of a slaughter plant, not just those entering production. IPP are to issue an NR for noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(b) (failure to handle the birds in accordance with GCP) when an ongoing pattern or trend develops where birds are not being slaughtered in a manner that results in thorough bleeding of the carcasses , that results in birds entering the scalder before their breathing has stopped, or that otherwise involves their being handled in a systematic way that results in their dying otherwise than by slaughter.

      NOTE: Additional discussion and guidelines for industry poultry handling and slaughter are found in the Federal Register notice “Treatment of Live Poultry Before Slaughter”, 70 Fed. Reg. 56624 (September 28, 2005).
       
  3. PERFORMING THE GCP VERIFICATION TASK
    1. The Public Health Veterinarian (PHV), Inspector-in-Charge (IIC), or designee, on a per-shift basis, when the establishment slaughters, is to perform either a routine or a directed poultry GCP task to systematically observe the conditions from the receiving to pre-scald areas, unless performing the weekly records review. Once a week the PHV, IIC, or designee is to review establishment records , when available, documenting adherence to poultry GCP, randomly selecting the day of the week on which to perform the review.
    2. During this records review, IPP are to ask the establishment for, and review, any records regarding GCP. An establishment may use video surveillance of live poultry handling areas and can offer this as a form of record. IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 5000.9, Verifying Video or Other Electronic Monitoring Records, for instructions for reviewing records created by video. When reviewing any records, IPP are to assess whether there is evidence that the establishment is monitoring its GCP from receiving through pre- scald areas. If IPP find that such records do not exist, or that they do not provide a basis to make a judgment on whether the establishment is following GCP, they are to visit the establishment areas from receiving through pre-scald and make observations. If the records provide a basis upon which IPP can make a judgment that the establishment is following GCP, then a poultry GCP task can be entered into the Public Health Information System (PHIS) as completed.

      NOTE: Establishments are not required to keep written or video GCP records. However, if establishments do keep such records and make them available, IPP are to review a sample of the records.
       
    3. During observation, IPP are to visit areas from receiving or holding through pre-scald to observe whether establishment employees are mistreating birds or handling them in a way that will cause death or injury or will prevent thorough bleeding or result in excessive bruising. For example, IPP should determine whether:

      1. Establishment employees are breaking the legs of birds to hold the birds in the shackle, squeezing them into shackles or otherwise mishandling birds while transferring them from the cages to the shackles;

      2. In cold weather, birds are frozen inside the cages or frozen to the cages themselves; or

      3. The birds are dead from heat exhaustion. The main observable symptom of heat stress in poultry is heavy panting, in addition to dead or dying birds in cages.

        NOTE: These examples do not necessarily describe prohibited activities and noncompliance, but can still warrant documentation through an MOI.

  4. DOCUMENTATION OF POULTRY GCP NONCOMPLIANCE AND MISTREATMENT OF POULTRY
    1. During poultry handling and poultry slaughter, IPP are to document through NRs or MOIs establishment failure to follow GCP. From a regulatory perspective, adherence to GCP is a process control issue and not a bird-by-bird performance standard issue. IPP are to write NRs for GCP noncompliance only when they can demonstrate that an establishment has lost process control and there is an ongoing pattern or trend of birds dying otherwise than by slaughter. An NR is also appropriate if the birds are not being appropriately bled out, with the establishment's handling practices resulting in the production of adulterated product [9 CFR 381.1(b)(v) and PPIA 21 U.S.C. 453(g)(5)]. But if IPP cannot support a loss of process control by an establishment, they are to document poultry mistreatment in MOIs.

      NOTE: Refer to Attachment 1, a question and answer scenario that clarifies verification of GCP for poultry.
       
    2. Writing a GCP NR
      1. IPP are to document that the establishment lost control of its process for handling birds, and thus is not operating in accordance with GCPs, when there is the repeated occurrence of birds:
        1. Dying otherwise than by slaughter (e.g., repeatedly entering the scalding tank while still breathing); and

        2. Not being appropriately bled out (e.g., as evidenced by equipment malfunction that results in increased numbers or clusters of cadavers being disposed of or condemned); or

        3. Being intentionally and repeatedly mistreated by establishment personnel.

      2. In determining whether there has been a loss of process control, IPP are to consider, among other factors, whether the cause of the problem is that the establishment’s equipment (e.g., bleeding or stunning equipment) is not functioning properly by asking the following questions:

        1. What is the problem?

        2. Is the establishment’s equipment (e.g., bleeding or stunning equipment) not functioning properly?

          NOTE: Stunning is not a requirement in poultry slaughter, but if stunning system malfunction contributes to other process control concerns then this should be noted by IPP.
           

        3. When did the problem occur?

        4. How long did the problem last?

        5. How did the establishment react?

        6. What did the establishment do to correct the problem?

        7. Were there periods of control?; and

        8. Did the problem reoccur?

      3. IPP are to document noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(b) when the establishment is found not following GCP. For example, an NR would be warranted when IPP observe frequent or repeated instances of birds not being slaughtered in a manner that results in thorough bleeding of the carcasses or of birds still breathing when they enter the scalder, and the process that the establishment is employing is not able to prevent these problems from reoccurring.

        NOTE: An isolated instance does not represent a loss of process control and is to be documented in a mistreatment MOI, not an NR.
         
      4. IPP are to follow instructions in FSIS Directive 5000.1, Verifying an Establishment’s Food Safety System, Chapter V, Section II. D., for entering the noncompliance. In the PHIS Poultry Good Commercial Practice task, when documenting GCP noncompliance, IPP are to include the following additional information in the description of noncompliance (Block 10):
        1. Enter the date and approximate time when, and identify the location where, the IPP observed the noncompliance;

        2. Describe the event and explain how it is noncompliant with 9 CFR 381.65(b) (e.g., birds observed breathing when entering scalder; birds not bleeding out (cadavers));

        3. Describe any actions taken by the establishment to address or correct the noncompliance;

        4. Document any regulatory control action taken and include the U.S. Reject tag number if a tag is utilized; and

        5. Refer to Attachment 2, an example of an NR for 9 CFR 381.65(b) noncompliance in PHIS.

    3. Poultry mistreatment MOIs are primarily issued when, based on findings by the IPP, the establishment is mistreating birds before or during shackling or elsewhere in the slaughter operation, up until the kill step, but the mistreatment event does not demonstrate that the establishment’s process is out of control (e.g., only single or small numbers of birds are involved, or an isolated incident that does not represent an ongoing problem), and therefore, there is not noncompliance with 9 CFR 381.65(b). The MOI documents the discussion between IPP and establishment management about the poultry mistreatment event.

      NOTE: FSIS Directive 8010.2, Investigative Methodology, Chapter IV, Section III, provides additional details for writing an MOI.
       
      1. IPP are to document poultry mistreatment when, for example:
        1. Isolated instances of poultry mistreatment occur after the normal kill step, such as a bird that is still breathing when entering the scalder; or

        2. There is an unusually high number of injuries to the birds, e.g., broken legs or wings, but there is no evidence of intentional mistreatment.

      2. IPP, after they have observed poultry mistreatment, are to:
        1. Notify the establishment immediately;

        2. Discuss the mistreatment with the establishment as soon as possible after the event is resolved and advise the establishment that preventing the mistreatment of poultry decreases the chances of producing adulterated carcasses;

        3. Document the discussion and any of the establishment’s planned actions by writing a mistreatment MOI in the poultry GCP task:

          1. Open a poultry GCP task in PHIS and verify 9 CFR 381.65(b) from the Regulations tab;

          2. On the Findings tab, check “Non-Regulatory Concerns”;

          3. Click on the “Save” button; and

          4. Click on “Create/Edit MOI”.

        4. Create the MOI in the Issues tab:
          1. Begin with the establishment number, establishment name, and the date and time of the meeting. List all the participants in the meeting, including IPP;

          2. Include a description of the mistreatment event, when it was observed, where it was observed, and the names of those who witnessed the event. IPP are to describe the observations that led them to the determination of the mistreatment;

          3. Summarize any actions taken directly by the establishment in response to the event and its response to any discussion between establishment management and IPP regarding the event;

            NOTE: IPP are not to quote the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1978, the National Chicken Council Audit Guidelines, the Federal Register notice - “Treatment of Live Poultry Before Slaughter,” or any of the establishment’s written poultry handling plans.

          4. Enter MOI text and click on the “Save” button;

          5. Click on “Finalize” to complete the MOI; and

          6. Provide copies of the MOI to the establishment, the DVMS, and the inspection file.

        5. Refer to Attachment 3, an example of an MOI for poultry mistreatment.

  5. DVMS REVIEW OF GCP NRs AND POULTRY MISTREATMENT MOIs
    1. ​​​​​​​In keeping with the instructions in FSIS Directive 6910.1 Rev 1, District Veterinary Medical Specialist (DVMS)—Work Methods, the DVMS is to correlate with IPP about FSIS policies and procedures that pertain to GCP in poultry. The correlation includes the review of GCP NRs and mistreatment MOIs to determine the accuracy and consistency of this documentation. In addition to Agency training provided on GCP principles, this additional DVMS involvement will help ensure that IPP are familiar with the issues that determine whether to document a GCP NR or a poultry mistreatment MOI and ensure that IPP consistently document these issues in the proper format.

      NOTE: The DVMS can generate a PHIS report of “Noncompliance Records for a District” using a filter for the GCP regulation, 9 CFR 381.65(b).
       
    2. In specific situations, after DVMS review of a mistreatment MOI, there may be a need for additional notification of the appropriate state officials. If so, the DVMS is to:
      1. Collaborate with the in-plant inspection team and the District Case Specialist to prepare a Letter of Concern (LOC) and a cover letter and send:
        1. The LOC to establishment management;

        2. A cover letter and a copy of the LOC to the appropriate state official;

        3. Copies of the LOC to the IIC at the establishment and the Frontline Supervisor; and

        4. Keep one copy of the LOC in the District Office (DO).

  6. IPP AWARENESS OF ESTABLISHMENT’S RESPONSES TO NRs AND MOIs
    1. IPP are to be aware that, if establishments have a PHIS e-authentication account, the establishment can respond individually to NRs and MOIs in PHIS. After the IPP finalize an NR or MOI in PHIS, IPP are to advise the establishment that it can go to its individual documents and add a response in the Plant Response text field or upload an attachment using instructions in the PHIS Industry User Guide.
    2. Specifically with regard to an MOI, if the establishment does not have access to PHIS, IPP are to document the objection, if presented verbally, on the MOI, or if written, IPP are to attach the objection to the MOI. IPP are to reference the attachment in the MOI and provide a copy of the MOI with the establishment response to plant management as soon as the MOI response is complete.


      NOTE: If the establishment elects to provide any other response, such as a proactive change to their program, this also may be attached to the MOI using these same methods.

  7. QUESTIONS

    Refer questions regarding this directive to the Policy Development Staff through askFSIS or by telephone at 1-800-233-3935. When submitting a question, use the Submit a Question tab, and enter the following information in the fields provided:

    Subject Field:       Enter Directive 6110.1.
    Question Field:    Enter question with as much pertinent detail as possible.
    Product Field:      Select General Inspection Policy from the drop-down menu.
    Category Field:    Select Slaughter/ Poultry from the drop-down menu.
    Policy Arena:    Select Domestic (U.S.) Only from the drop-down menu.

    When all fields are complete, press Continue and at the next screen press Finish Submitting Question.

    NOTE: Refer to FSIS Directive 5620.1, Using askFSIS, for additional information on submitting questions.


(Note: Download PDF for complete information)

​​​​​​​​​ATTACHMENT 1 - Clarification of Verification of Good Commercial Practices for Poultry 
ATTACHMENT 2 - Example of a GCP NR
ATTACHMENT 3 - Example of a Poultry Mistreatment MOI

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions