Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Residue Chemistry
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
          • Questions and Answers Concerning the Recently Published Generic Labeling Final Rule
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professional with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights
    • Employee News & Stories
    • FSIS Snapshots
      • February 2023 Snapshots
      • January 2023 Snapshots
      • December 2022 Snapshots
      • September 2022 Snapshots
      • August 2022 Snapshots
      • November 2022 Snapshots
      • July 2022 Snapshots
      • October 2022 Snapshots
      • June 2022 Snapshots
      • May 2022 Snapshots
      • April 2022 Snapshots
      • March 2022 Snapshots
      • February 2022 Snapshots
      • January 2022 Snapshots
      • December 2021 Snapshots
      • November 2021 Snapshots
      • October 2021 Snapshots
      • September 2021 Snapshots
      • August 2021 Snapshots
      • July 2021 Snapshots
      • June 2021 Snapshots
    • Submit Your Stories
    • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
    • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
    • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
    • Archives
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
      • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
      • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
      • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
      • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
      • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
      • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
      • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
      • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
      • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
      • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
      • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
      • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
      • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
      • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
      • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
      • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
      • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
      • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
      • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
      • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
      • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
      • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
      • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
      • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
      • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
      • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
      • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
      • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Conagra Brands Recalls Canned Meat and… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

The Technical Review Process - Revision 1

FSIS directive 5020.2
Series Type 5,000 Series: Program Services
Issue Date Jul 29, 2022
Full Directive
5020.2.pdf
  1. PURPOSE
    1. This directive provides procedures that FSIS headquarters personnel are to follow when an establishment or company submits a request for the Agency to review or evaluate a new technology (including new ingredients and antimicrobials), an on-line reprocessing (OLR) or off-line reprocessing (OFLR) system, a regulatory waiver request, a protocol requesting to conduct an in-plant trial, or a validation protocol for Agency review before in-plant validation. This revision updates and clarifies the procedural responsibilities of the program offices that participate in the technical review process.
    2. This directive also facilitates improved coordination and uniformity among the following program areas involved in the Technical Review Team (TRT):
      1. Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD);
      2. Office of Field Operations (OFO);
      3. Office of Public Health Science (OPHS);
      4. Office of Management (OM);
      5. Office of Planning, Analysis and Risk Management (OPARM); and
      6. Other FSIS program personnel as assigned.
      KEY POINTS:
      • Describes the types of submissions evaluated by the Technical Review Process.
      • Provides a summary of the roles and responsibilities of all FSIS headquarters personnel participating in the Technical Review Process.
      • Describes the joint review agreement between the FSIS and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established by Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 225-00-2000 Amendment 1 (MOU 225-00-2000 Amendment 1).
      • Describes the steps and outcomes of the Technical Review Process.
      • Provides instructions on how the Project Manager (PM) and TRT members are to document their assessment of support associated with requests and those that require a waiver from regulatory requirements.
  2. CANCELLATION
    FSIS Directive 5020.2, The New Technology Review Process, 10/24/17
  3. BACKGROUND
    1. FSIS regulations (specifically 9 CFR 303.1(h), 9 CFR 381.3(b), and 9 CFR 590.10 ) authorize the Administrator to waive, for limited periods, any provisions of the regulations so that new procedures, equipment, and processing techniques may be tested to facilitate definite improvements. Waivers of regulations may be granted, provided that the alternative procedures are not in conflict with the purposes or provisions of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.), or Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.).
    2. On February 11, 2003, FSIS published the Federal Register notice, “FSIS Procedures for Notification of New Technology” (68 FR 6873), outlining submission procedures for all official establishments (meat, poultry, and egg products) and companies that manufacture and sell technology to official establishments.
    3. The FSIS Guideline: Procedures for New Technology Notifications and Protocols provides guidance to industry concerning the procedures for preparing and submitting new ingredient requests, waiver requests, and protocols to the Agency. FSIS reviews these submissions to determine whether product safety, FSIS regulations, inspection procedures, and the safety of Federal Inspection Program Personnel (IPP) could be affected.
    4. FSIS Directive 5020.1,Verification Activities for the Use of New Technology in Meat and Poultry Establishments and Egg Product Plants, provides instructions to IPP to verify that meat and poultry establishments and egg products plants are following procedures for the implementation of a new technology (including new ingredients), an in-plant trial, or a regulatory waiver.
    5. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 225-00-2000 Amendment 1 establishes the process that FSIS and the FDA use to respond to requests for sanctioning the use of food ingredients and sources of radiation subject to regulation by FDA and intended for use in the production of meat, poultry, and egg products regulated by FSIS. FDA is authorized to determine the safety of substances (including Generally Recognized as Safe, food additives, and color additives), as well as prescribing safe conditions of use. However, while FDA has the responsibility for determining the safety of substances, FSIS has the authority to determine if new substances and new uses of previously approved substances are suitable for use in meat and poultry products. FSIS defines ingredients as any substances added to food with an intended use that results in it being a component, or otherwise affecting the characteristics of food. These include substances intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food, including any source of radiation intended for any such use.
  4. TECHNICAL REVIEW PROCESS OVERVIEW
    1. FSIS uses the technical review process to evaluate:
      1. New ingredients or antimicrobials (including new uses or new use levels for currently approved ingredients or antimicrobials);
      2. OLR or OFLR systems;
      3. In-plant trials or regulatory waivers, including waivers for establishments that participate in the Salmonella Initiative Program; and
      4. Validation protocols.
    2. The technical review process is managed by the OPPD, Risk Management and Innovations Staff (RMIS). When a request is received, an electronic record with a log number for tracking is created and assigned a PM. The PM receives notification, all associated files, and the submitter’s contact information. A notice is also sent to the submitter acknowledging receipt of the request, providing the log number and the PM’s contact information.
    3. The PM is the primary contact with the submitter and coordinates the following activities of the TRT throughout the review process:
      1. Prepares the review plan with the team;
      2. Monitors the status of review activities;
      3. Maintains up-to-date information and documents the TRT members’ assessments of criteria for all submission types in the electronic file;
      4. Facilitates actions to resolve correspondence between the submitter and the TRT;
      5. Drafts and clears the final decision and communicates the outcome of the review.
    4. The RMIS works closely with other program areas in the Agency to review submissions and determine whether the proposed new technology, OLR or OFLR system, regulatory waiver, in-plant trial protocol, or validation protocol:
      1. Affects product safety;
      2. Violates FSIS regulations;
      3. Interferes with inspection procedures;
      4. Jeopardizes the safety of IPP; or
      5. Is deemed suitable for use in meat, poultry, or egg products.
    5. Suitability relates to the effectiveness of the substance in performing the intended technical purpose of use, at the lowest level necessary, and the assurance that the conditions of use will not result in an adulterated product or one that misleads consumers.
      1. Substances recognized as safe and suitable under the conditions of their intended use, such as those listed in 9 CFR 424.21(c) are not subject to this technical review process. The latest substances that have gone through the technical review process and are recognized as safe and suitable under the conditions of their intended use, are listed in FSIS Directive 7120.1 , Safe and Suitable Ingredients Used in the Production of Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products.
      2. FSIS Directive 7120.1 provides an up-to-date list of substances that may be used in the production of meat, poultry, and egg products. It also lists the approved OLR and OFLR antimicrobial intervention systems. However, new uses of previously approved substances, including changes in concentration or application methods, are to be reviewed for safety and suitability by FDA and FSIS per MOU 225-00-2000 Amendment 1, as described in the Background section above. A complete listing of approved substances and OLR and OFLR Antimicrobial Intervention Systems may be found on the FSIS website.
    6. FSIS will make every effort to review the submission and respond within 60 calendar days for new technology (including new ingredients and antimicrobials), OLR and OFLR system, in-plant trial, and validation protocol requests, or 90 calendar days for regulatory waiver requests.
    7. If, after review, the Agency does not object to the proposed new technology, protocol for in-plant trial, regulatory waiver, or validation protocol request, RMIS issues the submitter a letter describing its determination.
  5. PRIMARY FUNCTIONS OF THE PROJECT MANAGER
    1. The PM reviews the submission to determine whether the submission requires technical review. If it does not, the PM drafts a letter describing the determination.
    2. If the submission requires technical review, the PM reviews the submission for completeness by verifying the submission includes all relevant written Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system programs and scientific and technical support. Supporting documentation may include theoretical principles, expert advice from processing authorities, scientific or technical data, product safety data sheets, peer-reviewed journal articles, pathogen modeling programs, or other information demonstrating that the proposed use or alternative procedures can perform as expected to achieve the intended objective. Documentation may also include approvals, if applicable, by other Federal agencies.
    3. If the submission does not have sufficient supporting documentation as well as scientific or technical support, the PM coordinates with the submitter until all questions and concerns are adequately addressed with sufficient information needed to conduct a technical review with a TRT.
    4. Once the submission is complete, the PM determines the scientific and technical expertise needed for a comprehensive review and serves as the conduit between the TRT and the submitter. If additional information is requested or clarification is needed, the PM coordinates with the submitter.
    5. During the review process, the PM prepares and clears correspondence. The PM ensures that the electronic record is updated regularly, and that all correspondence and additional documentation is uploaded when the submission is closed.
    6. After RMIS management clearance, the PM sends the correspondence to the submitter, uploads it to the electronic file, and closes out the submission using the appropriate resolution.
    7. In circumstances requiring revocation of a regulatory waiver, the PM assembles all documentation supporting the basis for revocation and reconvenes the TRT. An establishment may lose its ability to operate under waived regulatory requirements when it has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to implement and maintain compliance with alternative procedures used in lieu of regulatory requirements granted under 9 CFR 303.1(h), 9 CFR 381.3(b), or 9 CFR 590.10 (temporary waiver of regulatory requirements). This may include repetitive non-compliance with regulatory waiver requirements, loss of process control, or failure to comply with the non-regulatory terms of the regulatory waiver letter. The TRT reviews the supporting documentation and together decides whether to take an action of revocation and rescind the establishment’s privilege to operate under the regulatory waiver. If the TRT makes a determination to terminate the waiver, the PM:
      1. Drafts the letter of revocation and clears it with the TRT, RMIS management, the OPPD Assistant Administrator, and the Office of the Administrator;
      2. Updates the original electronic record associated with the waiver with all revocation documents and distributes the revocation letter to the establishment and original cc list; and
      3. Facilitates any meetings with the plant management and updates the Public Health Information System waiver record to show the date on which the waiver was revoked.
    8. At the conclusion of an in-plant trial, the PM reconvenes the TRT to review the results provided by the submitter in accordance with Section VI. After the TRT makes a determination, the PM drafts the final No Objection Letter (NOL), clears it with the TRT and RMIS management, and updates the original electronic record associated with the in-plant trial.
    9. If the submission contains worker safety information, the PM will ensure through RMIS management that the information is shared with Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, as appropriate.
  6. PRIMARY FUNCTIONS OF THE TECHINCAL REVIEW TEAM
    1. TRT members review the submission and provide comments, concurrence, or nonconcurrence within 2 weeks. In addition, to document their self-assessment, each TRT member provides a written rationale in support of their determination, which includes support considered and any analysis performed. Each team member uses their expertise to evaluate the submission for the criteria in Section IV: Technical Review Process Overview.
    2. The TRT works collaboratively to review the submission and consists of members from the following program areas: *Note: For in-plant trials and requests involving the waiving of regulations, the TRT is to include members from the OFO headquarters, the respective OFO district, and the OPARM.
      1. OPARM reviews applicable submissions for supporting documentation to determine whether:
        1. The statistical methods to be used to analyze the data are included;
        2. The sampling plan is statistically valid; and
        3. The sampling characteristics are described, (e.g., sample size and adequacy, for the hypothesis under investigation, and whether the selection of samples is conducted appropriately (i.e., to be representative of the population of interest)).
      2. OFO reviews submissions to assess whether new processes or procedures interfere with inspection activities and recommends inspection verification activities of alternative procedures and processes.
      3. OPHS assesses the adequacy of the scientific information, the proposed study or protocols, and methods used. The OPHS subject matter experts will analyze the microbiological, chemical, and toxicological data to ensure the conclusions drawn from the studies conducted are appropriate.
      4. OPPD establishes the data analysis plan for establishments operating under a waiver. The data generated during the waiver period is used to evaluate whether changes to the waived regulation(s) are supported (9 CFR 392). For all submissions, including those requiring waivers, OPPD determines if the technology meets the regulatory requirements, including whether the technology:
        1. Results in an adulterated product or one that misleads consumers;
        2. Requires a waiver of the provisions of the regulations;
        3. Prompts the Agency to conduct a cost-benefit analysis;
        4. Meets labeling requirements;
        5. Is consistent with food standards of identity; and
        6. Impacts FSIS inspection procedures.
      5. OM ensures safe and healthy working conditions for FSIS personnel as a part of the overall inspection process. They provide technical advice and support in identifying, assessing, and minimizing workplace hazards that can cause illness, impaired health, or significant discomfort as a result of exposure to chemical, physical, and biological agents. OM also reviews to determine if the technology impinges on the Labor Management Agreement or results in a change to conditions of employment.
  7. REVIEW OUTCOMES
    1. NOL: The RMIS Director issues a letter to the submitter stating that FSIS has no objection to the use of the technology (provided that implementation is according to all parameters set forth by the submission), and the OFO also receives copies of the NOL. This happens once the TRT determines, that the technology will not adversely affect the product, personnel safety, inspection procedures, or be inconsistent with any Agency regulation. In the case of ingredients, OLR, and OFLR submissions, the technology is listed in FSIS Directive 7120.1.
    2. Grant Permission Letter: The Agency issues letters granting permission to gather scientific support through in-plant trials when a technology has not been established in literature or is applied in an unusual way (modifying critical operating parameters from the literature). In-plant trials are experiments conducted to test protocols during commercial conditions. The experiments may take place in an official establishment according to the provisions of the grant permission letter. For in-plant trials, the NOL includes instructions for the establishment to notify RMIS and IPP 2 weeks prior to the implementation date. In addition to the letter, a summary of the verification activities, including the conditions of use for the technology, are sent to the OFO District Office and disseminated to the appropriate IPP prior to implementation. Upon notification, the OFO may request RMIS to arrange orientation of the in-plant trial or validation procedures with the manufacturer or establishment prior to implementation.
    3. Waiver Letter: If a submission for a regulatory waiver request is approved, the RMIS Director issues a letter granting approval of the use of an alternative procedure in lieu of a regulatory requirement. In addition to the letter, a summary of the verification activities including the conditions of use for the waiver, are sent to the OFO District Office and disseminated to the appropriate IPP prior to implementation. Upon notification, the OFO may request RMIS to arrange orientation of the waiver procedures with the establishment prior to implementation. If a waiver request is not granted, a written notice outlining the basis of the decision is issued to the submitter. In the case of a waiver revocation, see Section V.
    4. Temporary Submission Suspension: RMIS may put a submission on a temporary hold, permitting the submitter time to gather additional scientific support (e.g., time to conduct experiments in a lab or test facility). Submissions may also be suspended if submitters are unresponsive (longer than 14 days) during the technical review process.
    5. Submission Withdrawal: A submitter may request to withdraw their submission from the technical review process. If withdrawn, a submitter may resubmit to the Agency at any time.
    6. Letter to File (Memo To File): RMIS may create a letter to file when FSIS amends for FSIS Directive 7120.1 corrections, discovers new ingredients, or new uses of the existing ingredients during literature reviews.
    7. Not a New Technology: If it is determined that the submission does not fit under new technology, the RMIS Director sends a written notice to the submitter stating that the proposed technology is not considered a new technology and the technology may be used in accordance with current FSIS regulations, as listed in the letter.
  8. FSIS WEBSITE
    The Agency posts brief descriptions of the recent new technologies in the New Technology Table on the FSIS website. Once a safe and suitable determination is made for the use of a substance in meat, poultry or egg products, it is added to FSIS Directive 7120.1. An additional list of substances recognized as safe and suitable is also provided in 9 CFR 424.21(c). OLR and OFLR are listed in FSIS Directive 7120.1. A complete listing of approved substances and OLR and OFLR Antimicrobial Intervention Systems may be found on the FSIS website.
  9. QUESTIONS
    Refer questions regarding a specific submission to the project manager from RMIS to which it was assigned. Refer general questions regarding this directive as needed to the Office of Policy and Program Development through askFSIS or by telephone at 1-800-233-3935. When submitting a question, complete the web form and select New Technology, Innovations for the inquiry type.

NOTE:  Refer to FSIS Directive 5,620.1, Using askFSIS, for additional information on submitting questions.

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions