Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
          • Questions and Answers Concerning the Recently Published Generic Labeling Final Rule
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professional with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: WOW Frozen Food LLC Recalls Frozen Meat… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Imported Product Shipment Presentation - Revision 1

FSIS directive 9900.1
Series Type 9,000 Series: Exports & Imports
Issue Date Feb 18, 2021
Full Directive
9900.1.pdf

I. PURPOSE

This directive provides the instructions that inspection program personnel (IPP) are to follow when conducting reinspection of meat (which includes Siluriformes fish and fish products), poultry, or egg product shipments presented for import reinspection. FSIS is reissuing this directive to address procedural changes associated with the incorporation of instructions from FSIS notices and clarify when IPP are to verify the stamping of product with the official import mark of inspection.

KEY POINTS:

  • How to perform document review for shipments of imported meat, poultry, and egg products 
  • How to verify proper presentation of shipments of imported meat, poultry, and egg products
  • How types of inspections (TOIs) are assigned for shipments of imported meat, poultry, and egg products
  • When to verify the stamping of product with the official import mark of inspection to product through scheduling of the General Labeling (Imports) Task (04B04_I) in PHIS

II. CANCELLATION

FSIS Directive 9900.1, Imported Product Shipment Presentation, 11/3/15

III. BACKGROUND

IPP conduct reinspection of all amenable meat, poultry, and egg products offered for import into the United States (U.S.) for commercial distribution as human food.

IV. INSPECTION CERTIFICATES (9 CFR 327.4, 381.197, 557.4, and 590.915)

A. IPP are to verify that each lot of meat, poultry, or egg product that is offered for import into the U.S. is accompanied by the proper certification. Official inspection certificate data may be submitted electronically, government to government (eCert), through the Public Health Information System (PHIS), or with a paper inspection certificate (non-eCert).

B. Non-eCert countries: Verify that the paper inspection certificate:

  1. Is complete, accurate, and legible;
  2. Contains the country’s official seal, mark, or legend; the date the certificate was issued; and the name, title, and signature of the official authorized to issue inspection certificates for product imported into the U.S.;
  3. Does not have any items that have been erased, altered, or changed by any other means in sections IV. B. 2. or IV. C., below;
  4. Clearly identifies which product is from which foreign producing establishment if products from multiple establishments are on a single certificate; and
  5. Is in English. It may be bilingual, so may include another language.

C. Paper inspection certificates and electronic inspection certificate data are to contain the following:

  1. Foreign country of export and the producing foreign establishment number;
  2. Species used to produce the product;
  3. Source country and foreign establishment number if the source materials originate from a country other than the exporting country. This includes identification of source product if from the U.S.;
  4. The product’s description, including the process category, the product category, and the product group;
  5. Name and address of the importer or consignee;
  6. Name and address of the exporter or consignor;
  7. The number of units (pieces or containers) and the shipping or identification mark on the units;
  8. The net weight of each lot; and
  9. Any additional information the Administrator requests to determine whether the product is eligible to be imported into the U.S. (e.g., production or slaughter dates, when required). Production dates are required when there has been a period of ineligibility and PHIS is programmed to flag when production dates are required. FSIS issues notices when slaughter dates are required to be certified and verified by IPP.

D. A paper certificate is not required for countries that utilize eCert. IPP are to review the transmitted eCert data in PHIS to verify the accuracy and completeness of the transmitted certification data. IPP that have reason to question the accuracy of the eCert data in PHIS are to notify the Recall Management and Technical Analysis Division (RMTAD), Import Operations (IO) by email at importinspection@usda.gov that specifies the data elements in question. RMTAD, IO will provide responses with further instruction on how IPP are to complete any required corrections.

NOTE: In some instances, the importer or consignee and exporter or consignor information on the inspection certificate or in the eCert data may differ from the information in the application. IPP are not to fail the Certification TOI because of these differences.

E. Additional Certifications.

  1. Pasteurized Egg Products- IPP are to verify, in addition to the above items, that bulk packed shipments (tanker/tote shipments) of pasteurized egg products have foreign government documentation attesting to negative laboratory results for Salmonella.
  2. Poultry Grading Certificates- USDA’s Agriculture Marketing Service recognizes the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA) poultry product grade designations provided the poultry graded for export to the U.S. satisfies the criteria for U.S. grades. Canadian product labeled with the CFIA grades will be accepted provided the shipment is accompanied by an official CFIA grading certificate stating that the product meets USDA grade standards (e.g., “Young Turkey Canada A”). This certificate is in addition to the official foreign inspection certificate. If graded product is received without the accompanying grading certificate, IPP are to reject the shipment until a grading certificate is provided, or until the reference to the poultry grade has been obliterated or removed.
  3. Production Dates- IPP are to enter production date information into PHIS when product is presented from a country or foreign establishment with a history of being ineligible to export to the U.S. PHIS will determine whether the product was produced at a time the foreign establishment or country was ineligible to export to the United States. When product from an establishment or country with a history of ineligibility is identified by PHIS, IPP will be prompted (red error message) to enter production dates for each lot.
    • a. IPP will receive the red error notification when the reinspection assignment is drawn: When IPP receive this message and assignment, they are to refer to the inspection certificate or other supplemental documentation issued by the foreign country’s competent authority for the production dates and enter the production dates as certified. If the production dates are provided on supplemental documentation, the document must contain the inspection certificate number; the production dates that apply to each lot on the inspection certificate; and the name, title, and signature of the official of the foreign inspection system.
    • b. When the inspection certificate or other documentation does not contain certification of the production dates, IPP are to fail the Certification TOI in PHIS, which initiates a refused entry in PHIS, and refer to FSIS Directive 9900.8 Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products Refused Entry into the United States, for disposition.

F. When IPP observe errors or omissions with the certificate, such as listed in IV.B. and IV.C. above, IPP are to enter the Certification TOI as “Fail” in PHIS for the lot. IPP are to follow FSIS Directive 9900.8, and refuse entry on the lot.

NOTE: When IPP are verifying that foreign inspection certificates meet FSIS requirements, they are to accept “Primal-Subprimal” or “Cuts” interchangeably as product groups for Raw-Intact product certified by the foreign government on the foreign inspection certificate. This applies to either the electronic data that pre-populates the import application in PHIS from countries that participate in eCert, or a paper foreign inspection certificate.

G. IPP are responsible for checking for certification compliance. When performing the Certification TOI, IPP are responsible for verifying the unit count against the inspection certificate. IPP are not to rely on the official import inspection establishment to provide this information.

H. IPP are to accept minor deviations from the quantity certified by the foreign country’s competent authority on the official inspection certificate, based on the following:

  1. All shipping cartons presented for reinspection are marked with the shipping mark associated with the official inspection certificate accompanying the shipment. Discrepancies regarding shipping marks are failures of the Certification TOI and not the Labeling TOI.
  2. Identification or shipping marks can be duplicative. FSIS now accepts that shipping marks may be repeated from the same foreign establishment within a calendar year. If PHIS creates an error message for a duplicate shipping mark, IPP are to:
    • a. Submit a FootPrints ticket requesting the error be removed;
    • b. Resume reinspection with the certified shipping mark.
  3. When the number of shipping units is less than the amount stated on the inspection certificate, or inspection certificate data, IPP are to accept the lot provided the deviation is less than 10%.
  4. If the number of shipping units is significantly less (e.g., greater than or equal to 10% underage) than the number of shipping units designated on the inspection certificate or inspection certificate data, IPP are to ask the management of the official import inspection establishment to obtain an explanation for the significant underage from the importer. For example, if the missing portion is on another conveyance, the entire shipment is to be held until the remaining portion arrives. If there is no explanation for the underage, IPP are to fail the certification TOI and refuse entry.

I. When the number of shipping units exceeds the amount stated on the official inspection certificate, IPP are to:

  1. Accept the number of shipping units in the lot based on the following table:
  2. Refuse entry on the number of shipping units that exceed the permitted overage limits. The importer may choose to request a replacement certificate to rectify the refusal; and
  3. When the number of shipping units in the lot deviates from the number of units recorded in PHIS, IPP are to make the necessary corrections.

J. Replacement Certification:

  1. eCert - When IPP find that the eCert data is incorrect, IPP are to fail the certification TOI. When the applicant wants to replace the certification, IPP are to notify the FLS. The FLS will email RMTAD-IO at importinspection@usda.gov and RMTAD-IO will request a replacement document directly from the competent authority that issued the electronic certificate data. When the competent authority sends a new document, RMTAD-IO is to email the replacement document to the FLS who will provide it to IPP. IPP are to print the replacement, attach it to the case file and record the replacement number when rectifying the refused entry. Replacements that are not received government to government are not acceptable.
  2. Non eCert - When IPP find that the paper certificate is incorrect, IPP are to fail the certification TOI. If a replacement certificate is provided, because the original paper certificate was incorrect or lost, IPP are to accept either an original paper copy or an electronic copy transmitted as an attachment (e.g.) to an email sent directly from the competent authority to FSIS (e.g., import inspection personnel or RMTAD-IO). Such replacements that are not received government to government are not acceptable. IPP are to print the replacement certificate, attach it to the case file and record the replacement certificate number when rectifying the refused entry. IPP are to stamp incorrect certificates “USDA Void.”
  3. Voided original inspection certificates may be provided to the foreign inspection agency or the foreign country’s embassy upon request.
    • a. The requests are to be on the official letterhead of the foreign inspection agency or embassy.
    • b. IPP are to maintain a copy of the inspection certificate in the case file, along with a notation as to whom the original was given.

NOTE: The foreign inspection agency or the foreign country’s embassy may use email to submit the request provided the request is written on official letterhead.

V. PRIOR NOTICE

A. IPP are to be aware that the meat, poultry, and egg products import regulations require the applicant (e.g., importer, U.S. customs broker) to apply for the reinspection of product that is to be offered for import in advance of the arrival of each consignment. Applicants must submit electronic or paper import inspection applications to FSIS in advance of the shipment’s arrival but no later than when the entry is filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (9 CFR 327.5(b), 381.198(b), 557.5(b) and 590.920(b)). In this context, electronic means applications submitted through the CBP Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), Partner Government Agency (PGA) message set into PHIS. Paper applications are FSIS Form 9540-1, Import Inspection Application.

B. The objective of the prior notification requirement is to enhance IPP ability to identify shipments that are not presented for inspection, as well as to ensure that the notice and data entry in PHIS is performed well before the shipment arrives at the official import inspection establishment, thus avoiding delays in the reinspection of the shipment by IPP at the official import inspection establishment.

C. IPP are to verify that the application for each shipment presented for reinspection has met the prior notification requirement. IPP are to enter paper FSIS Form 9540-1 data into PHIS as soon as possible to avoid the unnecessary appearance of a prior notification or FTP violation. The following are examples of when prior notification has been met:

  1. If the Lot Status for any lot in the application is “PGA Received” or “eCert Received”, the prior notification requirement has been met; or
  2. If the Lot Status for any lot in the application is “Pre-Arrival”, the prior notification requirement has been met; or
  3. If the application status is “Unsubmitted”, and the Lot Status is “CBP Received”, or if the application cannot be retrieved in PHIS, the prior notification requirement has been met if a paper FSIS Form 9540-1 was submitted to IPP in advance of the shipment’s arrival.

D. When IPP identify a shipment that has not met the prior notification requirement, IPP are to:

  1. Notify the applicant that the shipment did not meet the prior notification requirements (9 CFR 327.5(b), 381.198(b), 557.5(b), or 590.920(b)), and that if this continues, future shipments that do not meet the prior notification requirement may be refused entry;
  2. Document such discussions in a Memorandum of Interview (MOI); send an email with shipment information to RMTAD-IO at importinspection@usda.gov;
  3. After entering and submitting the application in PHIS, access the first lot of the application, select “Lot Tracking”, then “Prior Notification Violation”; and
  4. Proceed with the reinspection unless otherwise instructed through supervisory channels.

VI. IMPORT APPLICATIONS

As defined in Section V. A., the meat, poultry, and egg products import regulations require the applicant (e.g., importer, or U.S. customs broker) to apply for the reinspection of product that is to be offered for import. Instructions for reviewing import applications are outlined in FSIS Directive 9900.4, Import Applications.

VII. FAILURE TO PRESENT (FTP)

A. Any shipment of meat, poultry, or egg product that has entered commerce without FSIS import inspection violates the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA); the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA); or the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA), as well as the implementing regulations (9 CFR 327.6; 381.199; 557.6; 590.925). Imported meat, poultry, or egg products are considered “in-commerce” when they are off-loaded at a location other than the official import inspection establishment or other FSIS-approved location (e.g., for unpasteurized egg products) designated on the import inspection application. When a shipment of product has been identified as an FTP, FSIS will request, through CBP, a redelivery of the shipment and appropriate penalties. If any imported product identified as FTP has been removed from the original cartons or further processed, FSIS will initiate regulatory control action to deal with the product, including any further processed product that contains the FTP product, to ensure appropriate disposition of the product.

B. IPP are to monitor shipments for FTP in the Pre-Arrival menu by the Estimated Date to Present.

C. If an FTP is suspected, IPP are to access PHIS and determine whether the shipment was presented at another location (e.g., other official import inspection establishment), the FSIS reinspection was assigned by PHIS, and FSIS reinspection was performed.

D. If the shipment is canceled, the broker/applicant should provide notification of the cancellation to IPP. IPP are to document the reason in PHIS and cancel the shipment.

E. When a shipment has not arrived by the Estimated Date to Present, IPP are to access the Lot Tracking menu through the Lot Manager screen and select “Send FTP Warning.” PHIS then sends an email notification to the applicant requesting a status update on the shipment.

F. IPP are to expect to receive the applicant’s written or oral response providing a shipment status update within the workday, provided the notification was sent early enough in the workday. The response from the applicant may come to IPP through the management of the official import inspection establishment, or directly from the applicant.

  1. If the applicant responds that the shipment is at the designated official import inspection establishment, IPP are to verify the shipment’s presence, access the Lot Tracking menu through the Lot Manager screen, and change the status to “On Premises.”
  2. If the applicant responds that the shipment has been delayed, IPP are to ask for a revised estimated date to present, access PHIS, and find the shipment on the Pre-Arrival Shipments screen. IPP are then to access the application in PHIS, revise the estimated date to present, click “Save” and “Continue”, select the “Submit” tab, and select “Submit.” This process will amend the estimated date to present for each lot on the application.
  3. If the location cannot be confirmed, or the applicant does not respond with a revised estimated date to present, IPP are to perform a basic investigation to determine whether an FTP should be issued by searching PHIS using “Find Shipments” and the applicable inspection certificate number.
  4. If the same certificate number is listed more than once, suggesting that the product was entered under multiple customs entry numbers (CENs) at different ports and different official import inspection establishments, IPP are to:
    • a. Verify that it is the same product and certificate with shipments presenting at different establishments. If so, IPP are not to issue an FTP under the CEN investigated;
    • b. Request a cancellation notice from the applicant; and
    • c. Delete the application and record the reason in PHIS.

G. If the certificate number is listed once, or if the applicant responds and states that the shipment by-passed FSIS import reinspection, IPP are to follow the instruction in VIII below.

VIII. FTP NOTIFICATIONS TO THE DO, FLS, AND RECALL MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS DIVISION – IMPORT OPERATIONS (RMTAD-IO)

A. IPP are to notify the FLS and RMTAD-IO by email of the FTP. Notify RMTAD-IOat importinspection@usda.gov.

B. Using the View Application function in PHIS, IPP are to save a pdf copy of the application to their computer’s hard drive and attach the application to the email notifications. They are to include on the email subject line the FTP, the date, and the official import inspection establishment number. IPP are to attach a copy of the email to the case file and give a hard copy to the import establishment management.

C. The District Office (DO) is to notify the Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit (OIEA) Regional Director (RD) and RMTAD of any identified FTP. FSIS Directive 8010.1, Methodology for Conducting In-Commerce Surveillance Activities, and FSIS Directive 8010.2, Investigative Methodology, provide FTP instructions for OIEA. The FLS is to update RMTAD on FTP shipment information, as necessary.

D. RMTAD-IO are to review incoming information for accuracy and verify that the OIEA RD was notified of the FTP shipment.

IX. RECEIVE LOTS/DRAW ASSIGNMENTS

A. When IPP are notified by import establishment management that a shipment is presented, IPP are to access PHIS, retrieve the lot, access the Lot Manager screen, select “Receive Lot” from the lot event drop-down menu (which will simultaneously “Draw Assignments”), and then proceed with verification of the lots.

B. If correction of an entry in PHIS is needed, IPP are to request corrected documents and access PHIS to make the needed corrections.

X. SHIPMENT STAGING AND LOT VERIFICATION (9 CFR 327.6, 381.199, 557.6, and 590.925)

A. IPP are to ensure that each lot of imported product is presented by the import inspection establishment in a manner that:

  1. Ensures the safety of IPP;
  2. Provides adequate space to select samples and perform verification activities; and
  3. Ensures that each shipping unit has an equal chance of being selected as a sample.

B. For Canadian shipments, IPP are to perform verification on one shipping unit from each lot on the inspection certificate assigned only Certification and Label Verification TOIs. The verification (e.g., compliance with application, foreign inspection certificate, and accurate labeling) is to be performed at the rear of the open shipping conveyance backed into the unloading dock at the official import inspection establishment. Lots that receive more TOIs than just Certification and Label Verification are to be staged in an approved staging area in the official import inspection establishment for reinspection.

C. IPP are to be aware that palletized, consumer packaged (including food service—hotel, restaurant, or institution (HRI)), fully marked and labeled products may be presented with the shipping mark and shipping container label applied to the outside of the pallet rather than to individual tray packs or cartons. When products are presented packaged in this manner, IPP are to verify that:

  1. Only one type and size of product is presented on a pallet;
    • NOTE: For Canadian shipments, different sized boxes of the same product may be presented on the same pallet when the pallets in the lot are to be split for distribution to specific end users.
  2. Fully marked and labeled packaged products are placed on pallets and secured sufficiently to allow efficient handling during sample selection. The pallet is considered a shipping carton;
  3. One main shipping label is present with sufficient space to apply the U.S. import mark of inspection (Exception: Product from Canada is not stamped with the import mark of inspection); and
  4. The inspection certificate identifies all the retail package production codes present (such as date codes imprinted on the can or package) in the shipment.

NOTE: For raw product, the inspection certificate does not require production codes, but all boxes must be fully labeled, including the shipping mark. This is to ensure the individual cartons do not lose their identity in the event IPP need to conduct reinspection on any of the product that would require the outside label to be removed from the pallet.

D. IPP are to perform the Certification and Label Verification TOIs (e.g., compliance with application, foreign inspection certificate, and accurate labeling) on all lots presented. For lots that receive more TOIs than just Certification and Label Verification, IPP are to perform all assigned TOIs as identified on the PHIS Lot Manager screen.

NOTE: Lots pending completion of non-regulatory Lab TOIs (e.g., Salmonella in raw poultry) may be stamped and released pending laboratory results.

  1. During the performance of the Certification and Label Verification TOI, IPP are also to conduct a routine inspection for general condition. IPP are to identify and have plant management remove any container from the lot that has obvious transportation damage resulting in product being exposed to insanitary conditions. Such transportation-damaged product is to be refused entry in accordance with FSIS Directive 9900.8.
    • a. Examples of transportation damage include torn, exposed, and crushed, or blood-stained cartons. A shipping carton stained from an external source, such as an adjacent carton or from internal Cryovac leakage, is not regarded as transportation damage. However, if a Cryovac bag is torn, and it is obvious product is exposed, the individual piece can be removed by the establishment from the carton and identified as transportation damage. This does not include loss of vacuum, unless the loss of vacuum is from the packaging being torn, or product appears to be unwholesome.

E. IPP need to perform all pending TOIs and enter the results before they can “Complete” the lot in PHIS. After all, TOIs are marked as “Complete” and recorded in PHIS, IPP are to release the lot by selecting “Release acceptable units.”, which will send a shipment release message to CBP and the applicant. IPP are to verify that acceptable units (products or placard) are stamped “U.S. Inspected and Passed” in accordance with section XI.

F. If a product fails a TOI, or the lot (entire or portion) is refused entry for other than a TOI, PHIS will refuse entry to the lot or portion of a lot. IPP are to follow the refused entry procedures outlined in FSIS Directive 9900.8 for disposition of the lot.

G. When a shipment is presented to IPP where product in the same shipping container within the same lot has different product groups, IPP are to email RMTAD-IO at importinspection.usda.gov. RMTAD will provide guidance to IPP on a case-by-case basis..

XI. VERIFYING THE STAMPING OF PRODUCT WITH THE OFFICIAL IMPORT MARK OF INSPECTION

A. IPP are to use the PHIS task calendar to schedule verification activities when the official import establishment stamps inspected and passed product with the official import mark of inspection.

B. IPP are to add the General Labeling (Import) task, and report findings in PHIS in accordance with FSIS Directive 13,000.1, Scheduling In-Plant Inspection Tasks in the Public Health Information System (PHIS). (Exception: Product from Canada is not stamped with the import mark of inspection).

C. When performing the General Labeling verification task, IPP are to:

  1. Verify the stamping of product by the official import inspection establishment is legible. If the mark is not legible, the plant can reapply the mark;
  2. Verify that the official import inspection establishment has applied the mark to all applicable shipping cartons; and
  3. Record results of the verification activity in the PHIS.

XII. UNSCHEDULED AND NOT PERFORMED TOIs

A. When IPP identify a situation that warrants an applicable unscheduled TOI, they are to determine whether the TOI is applicable for the product. If it is applicable, IPP are to add the unscheduled TOI and document the reason. If the TOI is not applicable, IPP are not to add the unscheduled TOI. When an unscheduled TOI is added, notify the FLS.

B. When IPP identify a TOI that cannot be performed on a lot, they are to document in PHIS that the TOI is not being performed, and identify, from the drop-down menu, the reason for not performing the TOI.

XIII. CASE FILES

IPP are to retain all documents related to a specific inspection event in a case file. This would include any documentation provided by the establishment to initiate the inspection, any documents or notes generated by IPP during performance of the inspection, any documentation provided by the establishment or applicant regarding appeals, any documentation regarding refused entry extensions and dispositions, and any additional documentation or correspondence requested by his or her immediate supervisor. Case files should be filed by country and certificate number and retained under FSIS control in accordance with FSIS Directive 2620.1, Revision 5, FSIS Records Management Program.

NOTE: IPP are not required to stamp the FSIS Form 9540-1 or the import inspection certificate, with the "U.S. Inspected and Passed" stamp; however, IPP are to stamp copies of FSIS Form 9540- 1 or the certificate if provided and requested by the importer.

XIV. QUESTIONS

Refer questions regarding this directive to the Office of Policy and Program Development through askFSIS or by telephone at 202-690-4354.

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions