Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Residue Chemistry
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
          • Questions and Answers Concerning the Recently Published Generic Labeling Final Rule
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professional with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights
    • Employee News & Stories
    • FSIS Snapshots
      • January 2023 Snapshots
      • December 2022 Snapshots
      • September 2022 Snapshots
      • August 2022 Snapshots
      • November 2022 Snapshots
      • July 2022 Snapshots
      • October 2022 Snapshots
      • June 2022 Snapshots
      • May 2022 Snapshots
      • April 2022 Snapshots
      • March 2022 Snapshots
      • February 2022 Snapshots
      • January 2022 Snapshots
      • December 2021 Snapshots
      • November 2021 Snapshots
      • October 2021 Snapshots
      • September 2021 Snapshots
      • August 2021 Snapshots
      • July 2021 Snapshots
      • June 2021 Snapshots
    • Submit Your Stories
    • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
    • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
    • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
    • Archives
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
      • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
      • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
      • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
      • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
      • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
      • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
      • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
      • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
      • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
      • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
      • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
      • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
      • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
      • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
      • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
      • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
      • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
      • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
      • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
      • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
      • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
      • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
      • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
      • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
      • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
      • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
      • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
      • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
      • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
      • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
      • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
      • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
      • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
      • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: FSIS Issues Public Health Alert for… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Food Defense Surveillance Procedures and National Terrorism Advisory System Alert Response for the Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit - Revision 7

FSIS directive 5420.3
Series Type 5,000 Series: Program Services
Issue Date Feb 06, 2014
Full Directive
5420.3.pdf

I. PURPOSE

A. This directive describes the Food Defense Surveillance Procedures that Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit (OIEA), Compliance and Investigations Division (CID) personnel are to perform and the frequency with which these procedures are to be performed. This directive also describes additional actions that are to be followed at in-commerce facilities and facilities (other than official import inspection establishments) located at ports-of-entry (“facilities”) when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issues a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) alert.

B. If there is an actual terrorist attack on a facility, OIEA personnel are to take immediate precautions to protect their personal safety and to notify appropriate law enforcement officials, their immediate supervisor, and the OIEA Assistant Administrator (AA) of the situation. In addition, the OIEA senior executive leadership may request the activation of the FSIS Emergency Management Committee (EMC) (see FSIS Directive 5500.2, Significant Incident Response).

C. FSIS is reissuing this directive as result of the Agency’s reorganization and of the change in the name of the office to OIEA from the Office of Program, Evaluation, Enforcement, and Review.

KEY POINTS:

  • How NTAS alerts are to be communicated
  • How to respond to NTAS alerts
  • How to effectively address and resolve noted security concerns to ensure that food that is in commerce is protected, thereby protecting public health
  • How to determine whether a facility has a functional food defense plan (FDP)

II. CANCELLATION

FSIS Directive 5420.3, Revision 6, Food Defense Surveillance Procedures and National Terrorism Advisory System Alert Response for the Office of Program Evaluation, Enforcement, and Review, dated 08/01/11

III. BACKGROUND

A. Food defense is the protection of food products from intentional adulteration with chemical, biological, physical, or radiological agents.

B. CID personnel conduct food defense surveillance tasks to identify potential vulnerabilities in facilities that could lead to or allow deliberate contamination.

C. When the Federal government receives information about a specific or credible terrorist threat to food or agriculture, additional actions may be needed to reduce the threat of intentional adulteration of food products.

D. Under NTAS, DHS coordinates with other Federal entities to issue formal, detailed alerts when the Federal government receives information about a specific or credible terrorist threat. These alerts include a clear statement that there is an “imminent threat” (warns of a credible, specific, and impending terrorist threat against the United States) or an “elevated threat” (warns of a credible terrorist threat against the United States). The alerts also provide a concise summary of the potential threat; information about actions being taken to protect public safety; and recommended steps that individuals, communities, businesses, and governments can take.

E. The NTAS alerts are based on the nature of the threat. In some cases, alerts are sent directly to law enforcement or affected areas of the private sector, while in others, alerts are issued more broadly to the American people through both official and media channels including Facebook and Twitter (@NTASAlerts).

F. Additionally, NTAS has a “sunset provision,” meaning that individual threat alerts are issued with a specified end date. Alerts may be extended if new information becomes available, or if the threat evolves significantly.

G. The Agency has developed numerous food defense guidance documents (e.g., model food defense plans, worksheets, checklists, and fact sheets) for consumers, industry, and state and local agencies. All of these materials are available on the FSIS Website at Food Defense and Emergency Response.

IV. NTAS ALERT NOTIFICATION

A. The FSIS Office of Data Integration and Food Protection (ODIFP) AA or designee is to determine whether the NTAS alert is expected to affect food or agriculture.

  1. If the threat is expected to affect food or agriculture, the AA or the designee is to inform the FSIS Administrator and FSIS Management Council.
  2. The ODIFP AA or designee is to determine the appropriate distribution of the NTAS alert information and to coordinate with the FSIS Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE), and OIEA to notify employees, stakeholders, and the public, as appropriate.
  3. In the event of a significant incident, the FSIS Emergency Management Committee may be alerted or activated and other response actions taken pursuant to FSIS Directive 5500.2.

B. When notified regarding an NTAS alert, the CID Director will notify CID personnel (in addition to any notification by ODIFP or OPACE). The CID Regional Offices, upon notification by the CID Director of the NTAS alert, to:

  1. Ensure that on-call procedures and updated personnel contact information are in place and ready for activation; and
  2. Direct CID personnel, while at a facility, to inform the management of the alert.

C. When an NTAS alert ends, ODIFP is to notify the FSIS Administrator and the FSIS Management Council. ODIFP is to coordinate with OPACE and OIEA, to notify employees, stakeholders, and the public, as appropriate. The CID Regional Offices, upon notification by the CID Director that an alert has ended, is to direct CID personnel, while at a facility, to inform facility management of the change in NTAS alert status.

V. FOOD DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

A. When there are no active NTAS alerts, or when the active alerts do not threaten food or agriculture, CID personnel are to conduct Food Defense Surveillance Procedures described in Section VII. B. When there is an NTAS alert with elevated threat to food or agriculture:

  1. The CID Director, CID headquarters staff, and CID Regional Offices are to be placed in a 24/7 on-call status.
  2. CID Regional Offices, when notified by the CID Director of the threat level, are to:
  • a. Direct CID personnel to perform Food Defense Surveillance Procedures described in Section VII;
  • b. Place CID Supervisory Investigators in a 24/7 on-call status;
  • c. Direct the collection of product samples as needed;
  • d. Coordinate with the Office of Public Health Science (OPHS) for testing of samples by the FSIS field laboratories or the Food Emergency Response Network (FERN); and
  • e. Coordinate activity at ports of entry with Office of Field Operations (OFO) personnel.

3. CID personnel, after being notified by the Regional Office of an elevated threat to food or agriculture, are to:

  • a. Conduct Food Defense Surveillance Procedures listed in Section VII; and
  • b. Inform management of facilities visited during the course of their duties of the current NTAS alert.

C. When there is an NTAS alert with imminent threat to food or agriculture:

1. CID Regional Offices are to:

  • a. Place all field personnel in a 24/7 on-call status; and
  • b. Instruct personnel to carry out any additional activities as directed by CID headquarters, OIEA management, through emergency response issuances, or by incident command.

2. After being notified by the Regional Office of an imminent threat to food or agriculture, CID personnel are to:

  • a. Conduct procedures listed above under Section V B (NTAS alert with elevated threat to food or agriculture); and
  • b. Conduct any additional activities as directed by CID headquarters, OIEA management, through emergency response issuances, or by incident command.

VI. FUNCTIONAL FOOD DEFENSE PLAN

A. The development of a FDP is voluntary. In-commerce facilities are not required to develop a functional FDP, and they are not required to share the plan they have developed with the CID personnel.

B. If the inspected facility has developed a FDP, CID personnel are to determine whether the plan is functional. A functional FDP has all of the following characteristics:

  1. The plan is written;
  2. The plan includes but is not limited to measures that address: outside security (e.g., door locks); inside security (e.g., restricted ingredients are secured); personnel security (e.g., method to identify employees in the facility); and incident response security (e.g., procedures to report unusual activities);
  3. The plan is reviewed annually (i.e., within the prior 12 months) and revised when changes occur in the facility that might affect the vulnerability of product; and
  4. The measures are tested annually (this testing can be as simple as testing locks on doors and conducting a periodic perimeter search).

C. When facility management develops and implements a new food defense plan, or when management revises an existing food defense plan, CID personnel are to reference this fact under Block 6 of FSIS Form 5420-3 when they re-visit the facility.

VII. FOOD DEFENSE SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES

A. CID personnel conduct surveillance activities in accordance with FSIS Directive 8010.1, Methodology for Conducting In-Commerce Surveillance Activities, at warehouses, distributors, and other in-commerce facilities and facilities (other than official import inspection establishments) to verify that persons and firms whose business activities involve FSIS- regulated products prepare, store, transport, sell, or offer for sale or transportation such products in compliance with FSIS statutory and regulatory requirements. These surveillance activities include procedures for food defense surveillance as well as for food safety, imported products, and other in-commerce surveillance activities.

B. CID personnel conduct Food Defense Surveillance Procedures to identify potential security vulnerabilities at facilities that could increase the risk of intentional product tampering and adulteration of meat, poultry, and egg products. A potential vulnerability can be any part of the food continuum system identified at the facility where measures should be taken to protect food products from intentional product tampering and adulteration, but such a measure is found to be missing or not in place. Examples of potential vulnerabilities include:

  1. Unrestricted access to product storage and staging areas;
  2. Unrestricted access to product processing areas;
  3. Unrestricted access to shipping/receiving areas; or
  4. Unrestricted access to water systems.

C. When CID personnel conduct Food Defense Surveillance Procedures, they are to:

  • 1. Determine whether the facility has a functional food defense plan;
  • 2. Determine whether the facility has a means to protect the outer perimeter and outside premises of the facility (e.g., cameras, security guards, lighting, alarm system, and locks);
  • 3. Observe and determine whether the facility has:

NOTE: This step is to be taken in facilities that store products only (e.g., distributors and warehouses) and facilities that process products (e.g., retail stores and restaurants).

4. Observe and determine whether the facility has:

  • a. A process that restricts access to the receiving/shipping areas to authorized personnel;
  • b. A process to verify that incoming/shipped products are consistent with shipping documents;
  • c. A process to examine all incoming products for indications of apparent tampering or adulteration (e.g., opened or resealed boxes; the presence of an unidentified substance on packaging or product; or questionable products, packaging, or labeling); and
  • d. A process for maintaining security of products during loading/shipping (e.g., trucks and trailers are locked or sealed while not under the direct supervision of company personnel). 5. Determine whether there are any indications of apparent product tampering or adulteration of products currently held in storage by the facility.

D. CID personnel are to conduct Food Defense Surveillance Procedures when a facility is reviewed for the first time or during a follow-up surveillance review where Food Defense Surveillance Procedures have not been conducted within the previous 12 months.

VIII. FOOD DEFENSE SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE DOCUMENTATION

A. CID personnel are to conduct the Food Defense Surveillance Procedures listed in section VII above and are to document the findings in the In-Commerce System (ICS).

B. If CID personnel find food defense vulnerabilities, they are to provide a hard copy of the completed FSIS Form 5420-3 to management at the time of the visit or subsequently via fax or regular mail. NOTE: CID personnel are to complete FSIS Form 5420-3 and print it using ICS.

C. If CID personnel do not have access to ICS while conducting the Food Defense Surveillance Procedures, they are to document findings on FSIS Form 5420-3 and enter the information from the Form into ICS as soon as possible.

D. CID supervisors, as well as other OIEA and designated ODIFP personnel, will have access to the data entered by CID personnel, in addition to having access to summary reports of the data in the ICS application.

IX. ADULTERATED PRODUCT OR POSSIBLE TAMPERING

A. CID personnel are to immediately follow the established policy described in FSIS Directive 8410.1, Detention and Seizure, when they have reason to believe that meat, poultry, or egg products in commerce are adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise in violation of the Federal Meat Inspection Act, Poultry Products Inspection Act, or the Egg Products Inspection Act.

B. CID personnel are to follow procedures defined in FSIS Directive 5500.2 when they have evidence or information that indicates that product may have been tampered with or other findings that may require completion of an Incident Report (IR).

C. The Regional Directors will determine whether he or she should refer the information obtained regarding possible tampering to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for investigation, using the criteria in the Memorandum of Understanding with OIG.

X. DATA ANALYSIS

ODIFP is to annually review food defense verification and surveillance activity data to evaluate the overall frequency and number of food defense procedures performed by CID personnel as well as potential trends in food defense vulnerabilities or concerns. The analyses will assist in the development of future guidance and policy regarding performance of food defense surveillance activities. At least annually, ODIFP will provide a summary of this analysis to the OIEA AA.

XI. QUESTIONS

Refer questions regarding this directive through supervisory channels.

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions