Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Residue Chemistry
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Foods Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
          • Questions and Answers Concerning the Recently Published Generic Labeling Final Rule
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Technical Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • USDA FSIS Laboratory Open House Registration
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • Environmental, Safety and Health
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Employee News & Stories
      • Submit Your Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
      • New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
      • Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
      • Thank You for Your Public Service
      • World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
      • Archives
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Conagra Brands, Inc., Recalls Frozen… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Reasonable Accommodation and Accessibility for People with Disabilities

FSIS directive 4306.2
Series Type 4,000 Series: Personnel
Issue Date May 17, 2005
Full Directive
4306.2 .pdf

I. PURPOSE

This directive provides Agency policy and responsibilities for providing reasonable accommodation and accessibility to people with disabilities.

II. (RESERVED)

III. REASON FOR ISSUANCE

This directive updates information previously found in FSIS Directive 4306.1.

IV. REFERENCES

FSIS Directive 1510.1, Equal Opportunity Notification on Material for the Public

FSIS Directive 4306.1, Employment of People with Disabilities (Including Disabled Veterans)

FSIS Directive 4530.3, Salary Rate Determinations for General Schedule Employees

FSIS Directive 4610.5, Alternative Work Schedules

FSIS Directive 4610.7, Flexiplace/Telecommuting Program

FSIS Directive 4630.2, Leave

DM 4300-2, Reasonable Accommodation Procedures

Sections 501 and 508, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as Amended

5 CFR 353, Restoration to Duty from Uniformed Service or Compensable Injury

5 CFR 1201.3, Appellate Jurisdiction

29 CFR 1614.103, Complaints of Discrimination

V. ABBREVIATIONS AND FORMS

The following will be referred to in their shortened form in this directive:

  • ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange
  • CAP Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program
  • DEP Disability Employment Program
  • DEPC Disability Employment Program Coordinator
  • DEPM Disability Employment Program Manager
  • EEO Equal Employment Opportunity
  • EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • FAX Facsimile Machine
  • FRS Federal Relay Service
  • HRD Human Resources Division
  • HRFO Human Resources Field Office
  • JAN Job Accommodation Network
  • KSA Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
  • OHRM Office of Human Resources Management
  • OPM Office of Personnel Management
  • SHRO Servicing Human Resources Office
  • TARGET Technology Accessible Resources Gives Employment Today
  • TDD/TTY Telecommunications Device for the Deaf

VI. POLICY

It is FSIS policy to:

A. Make reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities to enjoy equal employment opportunities unless it causes undue hardship to the Agency.

B. Ensure that buildings, events and materials are accessible to people with disabilities.

VII. COVERAGE

A. Parts One and Two of this directive cover FSIS employees and applicants whose medical condition or impairment meets the EEOC’s definition of a disability. (See Subparagraph VIII. C.)

B. Part Three covers people with disabilities who need access to Agency events and materials.

C. Part Four covers agency officials and employees who need information on reasonable accommodation resources.

VIII. DEFINITIONS

A. Commuting Area. The defined geographic area in which people live and from which they reasonably can be expected to travel to and from on a daily basis for employment purposes.

B. Decision Makers. Individuals responsible for making decisions regarding various aspects of the reasonable accommodation process. Possible decision makers include: an interviewing official, an employee’s supervisor or manager, a medical officer, the Disability Employment Program Coordinator or Manager, or a human resources specialist.

C. Disability.

1. The EEOC statutory definition of disability, for an individual is:

  • a. A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
  • b. A record of such an impairment, or
  • c. Being regarded as having such an impairment.

2. Subparagraphs b. and c. focus on the reactions of other people to a person having a history of impairment or a perceived impairment. They reflect Congressional recognition that stereotyped assumptions about what constitutes a disability, or unfounded concerns about limitations of individuals with current or previous impairments, form major discrimatory barriers.

3. Disability does not include temporary physical or mental impairments, or medical conditions that may have a short-term impact on an employee’s performance, example: a broken leg.

D. Disability Employment Program (DEP). The Agency’s plans and procedures that implement applicable laws, regulations, and policies related to the employment of qualified people with disabilities and disabled veterans.

E. Disability Employment Program Coordinator (DEPC). An HRD specialist who provides advice and assistance to program officials and employees on day-to-day issues involving reasonable accommodation and disability, including whether an employee’s condition meets the definition of disability.

F. Disability Employment Program Manager (DEPM). An HRD specialist, who coordinates the program, provides guidance and assistance to DEPCs, and develops Agency directives and notices on disability issues, as necessary.

G. Essential Job Function. A duty so fundamental to a position that an employee cannot do the job without being able to perform it. The manager or supervisor may consider a job function essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to:

  1. The position exists primarily to perform that function.
  2. The function is specialized and the employee was hired for the ability to perform it.
  3. The function is required and cannot be assigned to another employee.

H. Impairment. Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: neurological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory (including speech organs), cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitor-urinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine; or any mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities.

I. Interactive Process. An informal communication process between Agency officials and the employee or applicant in which they discuss a reasonable accommodation request, especially if the need for the accommodation is not obvious. The interactive process helps identify what type of accommodation might best help the person apply for a job or perform the essential functions of a job. Agency officials may offer alternative suggestions for reasonable accommodations during this process.

J. Major Life Activities. Functions that the average person in the general population can perform with little or no difficulty, including but not limited to: caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, working, sitting, standing, lifting, reaching, thinking, concentrating, and interacting with others.

K. Qualified Person with a Disability. A person with a disability who, with or without reasonable accommodation, meets the qualification requirements for the position, and can perform the essential functions of the position without endangering self or others. (Example: Must meet the education or experience and medical requirements of the position.)

L. Substantially Limiting. The degree to which an impairment prevents someone from performing a major life activity that the average person in the general population can perform, or significantly restricts the condition, manner, or duration under which someone can perform a particular major life activity as compared to the condition, manner or duration under which the average person in the general population can perform that same major life activity. To determine if an impairment is substantially limiting, consider the nature, severity, duration, and the permanent or long-term impact resulting from the impairment.

IX. RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Employees. Employees, or their representatives:

  1. Advise appropriate Agency officials that they have a disability that requires an accommodation.
  2. Provide requested supporting documentation.
  3. Participate in the interactive process.

B. Management Officials. Managers and supervisors:

  1. Actively pursue possibilities for reasonable accommodation. (See Part Two.)
  2. Participate in the interactive process.

C. DEP Manager and Coordinators.

1. Disability Employment Program Manager.

  • a. Ensures Agency compliance with its obligations to provide reasonable accommodation.
  • b. Provides direction and guidance to DEPCs on reasonable accommodation policies and requests.
  • c. Maintains liaison with the USDA manager. Prepares reports and provides statistics to Agency and USDA officials.
  • d. Develops policy and program initiatives for Agencywide implementation.
  • e. Maintains up-to-date knowledge of auxiliary aids and devices available for reasonable accommodation.

2. Disability Employment Program Coordinators.

  • a. Work with Agency employees to identify needs and plan for reasonable accommodation.
  • b. Provide guidance to supervisors and managers on reasonable accommodation policies and requests.
  • c. Record accommodation requests and decisions for tracking purposes. (See Attachment 2-4.)
  • d. Provide reasonable accommodation data to Agency and EEOC personnel for information and reporting purposes.

X. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Obtain additional information or clarification on this directive from the Employment and Benefits Policy Branch at 202-720-9866.

XI. (RESERVED)

PART TWO—REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION Section One—General Provisions

I. APPROPRIATE USE

A. Reasonable accommodation includes:

1. Changing a job application process to permit someone with a disability to be considered for a job. (Example: Providing application forms in alternative formats like large print or Braille.)

2. Making necessary changes for a qualified person with a disability to perform the essential functions of the job, such as:

  • a. Providing sign language interpreters, readers, or personal assistants.
  • b. Approving leave as appropriate. (See FSIS Directive 4630.2).
  • c. Modifying nonessential duties.
  • d. Modifying the work schedule. Example: Alternative work schedules. (See FSIS Directive 4610.5.)
  • e. Acquiring or modifying equipment, or providing auxiliary aids and devices. (Examples: TTYs, telephone amplifiers, Braille devices, adapted hardware and software for computers.)
  • f. Making the work environment accessible and usable.
  • g. Permitting telework or telecommuting. (See FSIS Directive 4610.7.)
  • h. Reassigning an employee to a vacant position at the same or lower grade level with no further promotion potential than the employee’s current or previous position.

3. Making changes for employees with disabilities to enjoy equal employment benefits and privileges. (Example: Removing physical barriers in a cafeteria).

B. The Agency is not required to change the essential functions of a position to provide accommodation for someone with a disability.

C. The Agency is not required to provide accommodation, if it will cause an undue hardship on program operations.

II. APPLICABILITY

Reasonable accommodation:

A. Applies to people who meet Subparagraph a. or b. of the definition of disability in Part One, Subparagraph VIII. C. 1.

B. Applies to a returning employee who incurred or aggravated a disability during uniformed service or after an on-the-job injury.

C. Does not apply to people who are only “regarded as” having an impairment.

D. Does not apply to people with a relationship or association with a person with a disability.

III. GENERAL ACCOMMODATION CRITERIA

A. Guidelines.

  1. Determine reasonable accommodation using the facts of each case; not generalizations, perceptions or stereotypes about a disability. Each person’s limitations from a disability are unique, therefore evaluate each accommodation request on its own merits. What is “reasonable” in one situation may not be reasonable in another, or in the same situation at a different time.
  2. Supervisors must use good judgment and a fair, common sense approach to make the decision.
  3. Employees are usually the best source of information about the accommodation, and should discuss their needs with the supervisor so the request is clearly understood.
  4. If several accommodations are proposed, the decision maker is not required to select the employee’s first choice, as long as the accommodation selected provides a means for the person to perform the essential job functions.

B. Specific Factors to Consider. The decision maker must consider the following to determine whether an accommodation can be made:

  1. Employee’s disability and resulting limitations as they relate to the job requirements.
  2. Essential job functions.
  3. Work environment.
  4. How the accommodation will impact program or business operations.

IV. TIMEFRAMES FOR PROCESSING REQUESTS AND PROVIDING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

A. General Timeframes. Many accommodation decisions can be made and the accommodation provided within a few days. Since special circumstances may influence timing of this process, follow these timelines.

  1. The accommodation request consideration process should begin as soon as the appropriate official receives an oral or written request from a person or representative. However, the process begins no more than 5 business days from the date of the oral or written request.
  2. When the person has an obvious or previously documented condition that qualifies as a disability and the accommodation requested is related to limitations caused by that condition, the first line supervisor determines if the accommodation is effective. If so, the supervisor provides the accommodation in no more than 30 business days from the date of the written or oral request.
  3. When the person does not have an obvious or previously documented condition that qualifies as a disability, the recipient of the request forwards it to the DEPC within 3 business days of receipt.
  4. With the employee’s permission, the DEPC requests any additional documentation from the appropriate source within 5 business days.
  5. Within 5 business days of receipt of the documentation, the DEPC consults with a physician, as necessary, and makes a decision on whether or not the employee has a disability.
  6. When documentation is necessary, the 30-business-day period for the supervisor or manager to respond to the accommodation request begins on the date the DEPC issues the decision identified in Subparagraph IV.A.5.

B. Extensions. It may be necessary to extend the processing timeframes due to extenuating circumstances.

1. Some examples of extenuating circumstances are:

  • a. Equipment purchase may take longer than 30 days.
  • b. The employee with a disability needs to try out equipment before purchase can be made.
  • c. New staff must be hired or contracted, or an accommodation involves removing architectural barriers.

2. The supervisor notifies the employee of the reason for a delay, and the approximate date on which a decision or provision of the reasonable accommodation is expected.

3. The supervisor investigates whether temporary measures can be taken to assist the employee. The supervisor may also use a temporary measure while the Agency is obtaining or evaluating documentation to determine if the employee has a covered disability.

4. FSIS Is not obligated to continue or offer further accommodations if the employee’s condition is not a covered disability.

V. UNDUE HARDSHIP CRITERIA

A. An accommodation is not provided when the action will incur significant difficulty or expense.

B. Undue hardship is determined according to the facts of each case.

C. Factors to consider when determining undue hardship include, but are not limited to:

  1. Impact of the accommodation on the program’s ability to conduct business.
  2. Composition, structure, and size of the workforce.
  3. Location of the worksite and type of facility.
  4. Nature and cost of the requested accommodation. (Cost is considered in relation to USDA’s available resources.)

VI. (RESERVED)

Section Two—Accessibility and Reasonable Accommodation in the Hiring Process

VII. VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

The vacancy announcement will:

A. Be accessible to all potential applicants. The SHRO publishes the toll-free TTY number for the FRS on each announcement.

B. Be reviewed by the SHRO to ensure the competencies or KSAs on announcements are required to perform the essential functions of the position.

C. Indicate that people with disabilities may be appointed under special appointing authorities, if applicable.

D. Contain the USDA nondiscrimination statement required by FSIS Directive 1510.1.

E. Contain a reasonable accommodation statement. Example: “This Agency provides reasonable accommodations to applicants with disabilities. If you need a reasonable accommodation for any part of the application and hiring process, please notify the Agency.”

VIII. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS

The SHRO makes reasonable accommodations at the applicant’s request. The SHRO may request only the supporting medical documentation necessary to determine the nature of the disability or how the accommodation will assist with the application process. Expedite requests for accommodation, since the application process is short.

IX. (RESERVED)

Section Three—Interviews, Inquiries and Medical Examinations in the Hiring Process

X. INTERVIEWS

A. Reasonable Accommodation for the Interview. The interviewing official responds to accommodation requests for the interview and provides the accommodation, unless it will cause undue hardship.

B. Acceptable Interview Questions. A job interview gives the interviewer and the applicant an opportunity to assess the applicant’s qualifications in relation to the job requirements. The interviewer focuses on the applicant’s abilities, rather than disabilities.

1. The interviewer asks job-related questions that:

  • a. Assess the applicant’s KSAs.
  • b. Relate to the applicant’s ability to perform specific job functions, tasks, and duties.

2. The interviewer provides information to help the applicant determine the need for accommodation, such as:

  • a. Provide information on the job requirements (tasks, duties, responsibilities and work schedule).
  • b. Discuss the regular work hours, leave policies, and attendance requirements.

3. The interviewer asks if the applicant can meet work schedule and attendance requirements.

4. The interviewer asks how the applicant will perform a job. Questions may relate to any job activity and are not limited to the essential job functions. Examples:

  • a. After describing the job activities, the interviewer may ask, “Can you perform these tasks?”
  • b. Only when the applicant indicates the need for an accommodation may the interviewer ask, “How will you perform the tasks, and what accommodation is needed?”

C. Unacceptable Interview Questions. The interviewer may not ask questions about the disability or illness even if disability is visible. Example: The person uses a wheelchair or guide dog, has a missing limb, or has volunteered information about a disability. (Questions about illness may reveal the existence of a disability.) The interviewer may not ask questions regarding the:

1. Nature or severity. Examples:

  • a. What is your disability? How did it occur?
  • b. How severe is your condition?

2. Causing circumstances or conditions. Examples:

  • a. Is your disability hereditary? Is it job-related?
  • b. Have you ever been hospitalized? If so, for what?
  • c. Have you had a major illness in the past year?

3. Prognosis or explanation. Examples:

  • a. Will the disability improve or worsen?
  • b. Is there any health-related reason why you may not be able to perform certain job functions?
  • c. Do you have any disability or impairment that may affect your performance in this position?

4. Need for medical treatment or leave usage. Examples:

  • a. How many days were you absent from work due to illness last year?
  • b. How much leave do you estimate using?

5. Other disability-related factors. Examples:

  • a. Have you ever been treated by a psychologist or psychiatrist? If so, for what condition?
  • b. Have you ever been treated for any mental condition?
  • c. Are you taking any prescribed drugs? If so, what?
  • d. Have you ever been treated for drug addiction or alcoholism?
  • e. Have you ever filed a worker’s compensation claim?

XI. PRE- AND POST OFFER INQUIRIES AND MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

A. Before an employment offer, Agency officials may not ask any disability-related questions or require any medical examinations, even if they are job-related. EXCEPTION: Agency officials may ask questions in order to provide an accommodation when they realistically believe an accommodation is needed.

B. After an applicant is given a conditional job offer, but before employment, Agency officials may make disability-related inquiries and require medical examinations, as long as it does so for all entering employees in the same job category. If an applicant is screened out because of a disability, the SHRO or the supervisor must document the exclusionary criterion is job-related and consistent with business necessity. The criterion must be, based on objective evidence, that the applicant will:

  1. Be unable to perform the essential job functions because of a medical condition; or
  2. Pose a direct threat because of a medical condition. The applicant would pose significant risk of substantial harm to self or others, and the risk cannot be reduced below the “direct threat” level through reasonable accommodation. The threat posed cannot be remote or vague.

XII. REFERENCE CHECKS

A. A rating official may NOT ask previous employers or other sources for information regarding the applicant’s disability or illness.

B. A hiring official may ask an applicant’s previous employer for information regarding:

  • 1. Job functions and tasks.
  • 2. Quality and quantity of work.
  • 3. Job Performance.
  • 4. Attendance record. A hiring official may not ask about an applicant’s attendance as it relates to illness or disability. This applies even if the applicant volunteered the information or the hiring official knows that the applicant has a disability. (Example: The hiring official may ask a previous employer, “Could you comment on the applicant’s attendance record while employed with you?”)
  • 5. Other job-related issues that do not relate to disability.
  • 6. Accommodations made by that employer, if the applicant has a known disability and indicates the ability to do a job with reasonable accommodation.

XIII. (RESERVED)

See full PDF for Attachments 

  • ACCOMMODATION APPROVAL PROCESS
  • ACCOMMODATION DENIAL PROCESS
  • DENIAL RECONSIDERATION PROCESS
  • REASSIGNMENT EFFORTS
  • DISABILITY RETIREMENT
  • DOCUMENTING A MEDICAL CONDITION FOR AN ACCOMMODATION REQUEST
  • MAINTAINING CONFIDENTIALITY OF MEDICAL INFORMATION
  • SAMPLE FSIS FORM 4306-2, AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE MEDICAL INFORMATION
  • SAMPLE DECISION LETTER TO EMPLOYEE
  • EMPLOYEE REASSIGNMENT RESPONSE
  • SAMPLE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION CASE SUMMARY
  • MAKING EVENTS AND MATERIALS ACCESSIBLE
  • ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCOMMODATION GUIDELINES
  • REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION RESOURCES
  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions