Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat & Fish
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Ovoproductos e Inocuidad Alimentaria
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
      • FSIS/ORISE Food Safety Fellowship Program
        • Aaron Dudley
        • Lauren Lee
        • Sharon Nieves-Miranda
        • Yesutor Soku
        • Ali Strickland
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Developer Resources
      • Recall API
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2024
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2023-2025 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Hiring Paths
      • The Joint Disability Employment Network (JDEN)
      • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
      • Professionals with Disabilities
      • FSIS Student Employment Programs
      • Externships and Volunteer Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Family Legacy at USDA Led to Leigh Ann Acree’s Rewarding FSIS Career
      • CSI James McDonald’s Federal Career Spans 55 Years and Counting
      • Dr. Kenneth Clevenger — Celebrating a 60-Year Federal Career Offering Work-Life Balance
      • Archives
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Performance Management
    • Forms
    • Understanding Your Benefits
      • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • November 2023 Snapshots
        • October 2023 Snapshots
        • September 2023 Snapshots
        • August 2023 Snapshots
        • July 2023 Snapshots
        • June 2023 Snapshots
        • May 2023 Snapshots
        • April 2023 Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • 2023 National Disability Employment Awareness Month
      • Program Analyst Cedric Hardy’s “Third Act” is with FSIS
      • FSIS at Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Conference
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: Hispanic Heritage Month — Latinos: Driving Prosperity, Power and Progress in America
        • ARCHIVE: The Power of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs: Resolving Workplace Conflicts Efficiently
        • ARCHIVE: Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
        • ARCHIVE: Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
        • ARCHIVE: Supervisors Make All the Difference!
        • ARCHIVE: Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month — Workplace Violence: Active Shooter
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Unidos: Inclusivity for a Stronger Nation
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Emergency Alerts
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Data Scientist — and Puzzle Solver — Justin Ronca
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Skyline Provisions, Inc. Recalls Raw… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2023-2025 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Administrative Grievance System - Revision 3

FSIS directive 4771.1
Series Type 4000 Series: Personnel
Issue Date Jul 31, 2006
Full Directive
4771.1 .pdf

I. PURPOSE

This directive describes policy and procedures for the Administrative Grievance System (AGS). The System provides a fair, equitable, and timely forum for internal review and resolution of employment-related disputes.

II. CANCELLATION

This directive cancels FSIS Directive 4771.1, Revision 2, dated 2/18/98. III. REASON FOR REISSUANCE This directive is completely rewritten to:

A. Update information for filing a grievance under the AGS.

B. Update coverage of subject matter.

C. Update AGS Flowchart (see Attachment 4-1).

D. Add Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (see Attachment 4-2).

IV. REFERENCES

5 U.S.C. 2302, Prohibited Personnel Practices

FSIS Directive 4713.3, Equal Employment Opportunity

V. ABBREVIATIONS AND FORMS

The following will appear in their shortened form:

  • AGS Administrative Grievance System
  • EEO Equal Employment Opportunity
  • EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • LERD Labor and Employee Relations Division
  • MSPB Merit Systems Protection Board
  • OPM Office of Personnel Management
  • HRD Human Resources Division
  • SES Senior Executive Service

VI. POLICY

FSIS recognizes that occasional dissatisfaction and disagreement may occur in a working environment, which might adversely affect the Agency’s mission. It is the Agency's goal to resolve employee concerns quickly, fairly and informally whenever possible by:

A. Ensuring that no restraint, reprisal, coercion, intimidation, interference or discrimination is practiced against any employee filing an administrative grievance.

B. Ensuring that the filing of an administrative grievance does not adversely reflect on the employee's supervisor.

VII. DEFINITION

Administrative Grievance. A request by an employee or group of employees acting as individuals, seeking personal relief in a matter of concern or dissatisfaction on their employment, subject to the control of FSIS management officials.

VIII. EMPLOYEES COVERED BY A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

A. This directive applies to any employee not covered by a negotiated grievance procedure established through negotiations with a labor organization to which exclusive recognition has been granted.

B. Employees covered by such an agreement must follow the grievance provisions of the applicable contract.

PART TWO—SYSTEM COVERAGE

I. EMPLOYEE COVERAGE

A. Generally, all FSIS nonbargaining unit employees are covered.

B. Excludes:

  1. Applicants for employment.
  2. Bargaining unit employees covered by a negotiated grievance procedure.

II. SUBJECT MATTER COVERAGE

A. Except as excluded from coverage in Subparagraph III.C., this directive applies to matters relating to an individual’s employment about which an employee expresses concern or dissatisfaction and which is subject to the control of the FSIS management, including any matter in which coercion, reprisal, or retaliation has been allegedly practiced against an employee.

B. Excludes:

  1. Established FSIS policy or regulations.
  2. Other grievance, appeal, complaint or other dispute resolution process, with respect to the same employee.
  3. Nonselection for promotion from a group of properly ranked and certified candidates, or failure to receive a noncompetitive promotion.
  4. Complaint of discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, or physical or mental disabling conditions.
  5. A preliminary warning or notice of an action.
  6. Suspension of more than 14 calendar days, reduction in grade or pay, furlough of 30 calendar days or less, and removal.
  7. The termination of a time-limited promotion within a maximum period of 2 years, and the subsequent reassignment of an employee to another position at the same grade or pay, or the return of an employee to the position from which the employee was temporarily promoted.
  8. Determinations on awards, suggestions, step increases, recruitment and relocation incentives, and retention incentives.
  9. An action taken according to the terms of a formal agreement voluntarily entered into by an employee, including reassignment to a different geographic location.
  10. The placement or return of an employee serving a supervisory or managerial probationary period to a non-supervisory or non-managerial position, which may include a reduction in force.
  11. SES performance evaluation.
  12. Reassignment of a SES appointee following the appointee’s receipt of an unsatisfactory rating.
  13. A return of a SES career appointee to the General Schedule or another pay schedule during the 1 year period of probation or for less than fully successful executive performance.
  14. The termination of a SES career appointee during probation for unsatisfactory performance.
  15. The substance of the critical elements and performance standards of an employee’s position.
  16. Unsatisfactory performance rating during a probationary or trial period.
  17. Removal or separation of Schedule C, noncareer SES, and nonpreference eligible excepted service employee.
  18. The termination of a probationary employee for unsatisfactory performance or conduct.

III. DECISIONS APPEALABLE OUTSIDE USDA

Do not use the AGS for disputes if an employee is entitled to file an appeal, grievance, or formal challenge as follows:

A. Decisions Appealable to MSPB.

  1. Violation of employment priority rights.
  2. Reduction-in-force action.
  3. Violation of reemployment or reinstatement rights.
  4. Violation of restoration rights.
  5. Denial of within-grade step increase.
  6. Adverse action for:
  • a. Political activity, such as removal, demotion, or suspension of more than 14 calendar days.
  • b. Other reasons, such as removal, suspension of more than 14 calendar days, reduction in grade or pay, or furlough of 30 calendar days or less.

7. Termination during probationary period if employee alleges termination resulted from discrimination based on partisan political reasons or marital status.

8. OPM determinations on disability retirement or voluntary retirement where an individual’s rights or interest are adversely affected.

B. Decisions Appealable to OPM.

  1. Position classification decision.
  2. Salary retention decision.
  3. Action reviewable under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  4. Life insurance, health benefits, or retirement decision.

C. Decisions Appealable to EEOC. Complaints of discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical or mental disabling conditions. (See FSIS Directive 4713.1.)

IV. GENERAL PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS

A. Advisement. Administrative officials should arrange for employees to have access to discuss individual problems affecting their status and welfare. The Agency prefers to resolve employee dissatisfactions and disagreements informally. Employees should communicate with and seek advice from their immediate supervisor or other Agency management officials (human resources specialists, EEO counselors) on employee responsibilities, conduct, complaints, grievances, and appeals.

B. Informal Resolutions.

  1. The Agency encourages informal resolutions at any stage of the grievance process.
  2. The Agency encourages reasonable attempts from Agency managers, supervisors, and the grievant to resolve a grievance at any time.
  3. To facilitate the informal and voluntary resolution of employment-related disputes before or with the AGS process, use counseling, mediation, or other processes.

C. Representation. An employee is entitled to have a personal representative attend, represent, or advise the employee at any stage of their grievance. A representative may be disallowed if the Agency determines that the representative creates a conflict of interest, is required to perform other priority work for the Agency, or the employee's selection would give rise to unreasonable delays in the processing of the grievance or unreasonable costs to the Agency. If the employee wants the Agency to recognize the representative and send materials to the representative, the employee must inform the Agency in writing.

D. Official Time. The grieving employee and the representative, if an FSIS employee, are granted a reasonable amount of official time to present the grievance, provided they are in a duty status. Official time to prepare the grievance is not allowed.

E. Protection. Grievant and their representatives are free from restraint, coercion, intimidation, or reprisal in presenting a grievance. If grievants believe they were subjected to any of the above actions, the grievants:

  1. Should notify the Director, LERD in writing, within 7 calendar days of the occurrence.
  2. Must either request to add the allegations to the grievance being presented or forward the allegations for review at the Department level.

F. Reviewing Files. LERD establishes an employee grievance file and maintains the file as the official record of grievance proceedings. Either the grievant or their authorized representative receives a copy of all the material and information on which the proposed dispositions are based.

G. Cancellation or Suspension of Grievance. The Agency may cancel or suspend a grievance or a portion of a grievance when the grievant:

  1. Specifically requests such action.
  2. Fails to provide sufficient detail to clearly identify the grievance or fails to specify the personal relief.
  3. Requests disciplinary or other action against another employee.
  4. Fails to comply with established timeframes and procedures.
  5. Has previously filed or later files an appeal, EEO complaint, or other formal challenge on the same matter.

PART THREE--INFORMAL PROCESS

I. MANDATORY USE

A. Employees must complete the informal grievance procedure before filing a formal grievance, except in cases of a suspension of 14 calendar days or less, or when the Agency Ethics Officer determines a conflict of interest. (See Part Four, Subparagraph I. A. 2.)

B. Supervisors may not reject a grievance at the informal stage. Supervisors maintain an "open door" policy and attempt to informally resolve work-related problems or matters of concern to employees.

II. EMPLOYEE'S RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Time Limit for Presentation. An employee shall file an informal grievance within 15 calendar days of the date of the act or occurrence which is the basis for the grievance, or the date the employee learned of the act or occurrence. The informal grievance is considered whether or not it was filed within the time limit, even though it may be rejected as untimely if and when it is filed as a formal grievance.

B. Presentation. The employee presents the grievance to the official at the lowest level having authority to make a decision on the matter. If this person is not known to the employee, the grievance is submitted to the employee's immediate supervisor. The supervisor determines who has authority to resolve the matter.

C. Format of Grievance. The employee can present an informal grievance orally or in writing. The employee must identify the matter of concern and state that he or she is filing a grievance and initiating the grievance process.

III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SUPERVISORS AND OTHER OFFICIALS

A. The immediate supervisor or other official shall attempt to resolve the grievance by correction, adjustment, or other appropriate action through reasonable and good faith efforts at the mandatory informal stage. (This requirement at the informal stage does not preclude resolution attempts at later stages of the process.)

B. If an employee presents a grievance to their supervisor which is beyond the supervisor's authority, the supervisor must promptly refer the matter to the appropriate official for action and inform the employee in writing of the referral.

C. The supervisor or appropriate official shall issue a Notice of Termination of Informal Grievance Procedures or a written confirmation of resolution to the employee. The Notice must be signed by the supervisor on completion of the informal grievance stage. The employee must receive and sign the Notice within 15 calendar days of the date the grievance is initiated, unless extended by mutual agreement, and must include the information outlined in Paragraph IV.

IV. NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF INFORMAL GRIEVANCE

The employee receives a termination notice when the informal grievance stage ends. The Notice clearly identifies the issues of the grievance and any attempts and decisions made to resolve them. The Notice advises the employee of the right to submit a formal grievance and states that a formal grievance must:

A. Be made within 10 calendar days of employee's receipt of the Notice of Termination of Informal Grievance Procedures.

B. Be sent to the:

  • USDA FSIS ADMINISTRATOR
  • ATTENTION: DIRECTOR LERD
  • 1400 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW ROOM 3175S
  • WASHINGTON DC 20250-3700

C. Be in writing and contain the employee’s or authorized representative’s signature.

D. State clearly the matter or issue that is the subject of the grievance, including all documentation from which a decision may be based.

E. Specify facts to support the issue of disagreement, items which are unresolved and the relief requested.

PART FOUR--FORMAL PROCESS

I. PRESENTING A FORMAL GRIEVANCE

A. Filing.

1. The employee submits a formal grievance in writing to the:

  • USDA FSIS ADMINISTRATOR
  • ATTENTION: DIRECTOR LERD
  • 1400 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW ROOM 3175S
  • WASHINGTON DC 20250-3700

2. The employee must submit the formal written grievance as follows no later than:

  • a. 10 calendar days after the employee receives the Notice of Termination of Informal Grievance. (See Part Three, Subparagraph IV.)
  • b. 15 calendar days after the effective date of a suspension of 14 calendar days or less. In such cases, an employee may file a formal grievance without first using the informal process for resolution. (See Attachment 4-1.)

3. The grievance must:

  • a. Contain the employee’s or authorized representative’s signature.
  • b. Clearly state the matter or issue that is the subject of the grievance. Include all documentation and any additional evidence to aid in decision making. An employee may not change or add issues except for an allegation of reprisal actions for filing the informal grievance.
  • c. Specify facts to support the issue of disagreement, unresolved items, and a request for personal relief.

B. Acceptance or Rejection. The employee receives notice of the formal grievance’s acceptance or rejection.

1. The grievance should be rejected when it:

  • a. Concerns a matter excluded from the system.
  • b. Has not been pursued informally where an attempt at informal resolution is required.

2. The grievance may be rejected for untimely filing if it does not meet a requirement for processing which may or may not be based on timeliness.

3. Any rejection at this stage of a grievance may be reviewed at the employee’s request no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the rejection notice. This time limit may be extended if there is good cause shown by the employee.

C. Cancellation. A formal grievance may be canceled at any step of the formal process if no relief can be legally provided due to the separation of the employee or if some form of relief has already been granted removing the need or basis for any further relief. Any resolution or voluntary withdrawal of the grievance at the formal stage shall be submitted in writing to:

  • USDA FSIS ADMINISTRATOR
  • ATTENTION: DIRECTOR LERD
  • 1400 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW ROOM 3175S
  • WASHINGTON DC 20250-3700

II. ADMINISTRATOR'S RESPONSE

A. The Administrator or designee issues a decision on the grievance within 90 calendar days of the receipt of the formal grievance.

B. If no decision is issued within 90 calendar days, and an extension of time is not mutually agreed upon between the employee and the Agency, the employee may elevate the grievance to the Department.

C. If the Agency's decision is not acceptable to the employee, the employee may appeal the decision.

1. The employee must submit a written appeal, within 10 calendar days of receipt of the Agency decision, to the:

  • USDA FSIS ADMINISTRATOR
  • ATTENTION: DIRECTOR LERD
  • 1400 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW ROOM 3175S
  • WASHINGTON DC 20250-3700

2. The appeal must clearly state the matters or issues of disagreement.

D. The Agency promptly forwards an indexed copy of the grievance file and the grievant’s request to the Department and certifies that the grievant received a copy of the grievance file.

III. FACTFINDER'S REVIEW

The Department appoints a factfinder to consider the appeal and recommend a decision to the Administrator. Additional information supplied to the factfinder which was not previously furnished to the employee or the Agency is made available to both parties by the factfinder. The parties have 15 calendar days to review the material, comment, and offer additional evidence. The Department factfinder issues a recommended decision, and sends copies of the recommended decision to the Administrator and the grievant.

IV. FINAL DECISION

If the factfinder's recommended decision:

A. Agrees with the Administrator's decision, no further action is taken and the grievance is closed.

B. Disagrees with the Administrator's decision, the Administrator may:

  1. Choose to implement the grievant’s recommended relief.
  2. Request, within 5 calendar days, that the matter be reviewed by another fact finder. The recommended decision of the second factfinder is binding on the Administrator, and the Administrator will implement the Department's recommended resolution.

V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

See Attachment 4-2 for Frequently Asked Questions and Answers.

See full PDF for Attachments 

  • Administrative Grievance System Flowchart
  • Frequently Asked Questions and Answers
  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions