| Label Sketch
Are the up-to-8 required features on the label? Are they in the required locations according to 9 CFR 317 and 381, Subparts N and Y, and consistent with the food standards in 9 CFR 319 and 381, Subpart P?
Back to Top
- Product Name ( 9 CFR 317.2(c) and 381.117)
- Is there an accurate product name?
- Does the name invoke a standard?
- Is that standard met, i.e., is it shown, through the formulation and processing procedures, that the standard is met? For example, 9 CFR 317.312 "Beef in Barbeque Sauce" requires 50% cooked beef that is cooked to yield 70% or less. If the beef is injected, the yield is from the green weight of the un-injected beef.
- USDA Inspection Legend ( 9 CFR 312.2, 317.2(i), 381.96)
- Is there an inspection legend on the label?
- Is the correct legend used?
- Is the correct plant number used?
- If dual legends are used, is the product HRI only?
- Is the Establishment # in the legend, if not where is it?
- Net Weight ( 9 CFR 317.2(h), 381.121)
- Are the size, spacing and location correct?
- If no net weight, did you stipulate net weight applied at retail?
- Handling Statement ( 9 CFR 317.2(k), 381.125(a))
- Is the handling statement appropriate?
- Is the handling statement supported by processing procedures?
- Does the handling statement conflict with claims, i.e., "fresh"?
- Address (Signature) Line ( 9 CFR 317.2(g), 381.122)
- Is a zip code included?
- Is the address line contiguous to the ingredients statement on the information panel?
- Does the signature line require "Distributed by" or "Packed for"?
- Ingredients Statement ( 9 CFR 317.2(f), 381.118)
- Are all multi-ingredient components sublisted?
- If the product is an import, are all spices/natural flavors identified by their common or usual name in the formula?
- Is the order of predominance supported by the formula?
- Is the ingredients statement presented as components (i.e., with component ingredients sublisted) or as a composite of all ingredients?
- Are common or usual names, not brand/trade names, used in the formula?
- Nutrition Facts ( 9 CFR 317.300 - 317.400, 381.400-381.500)
- Is the correct RACC used for the serving size?
- Is the serving size correctly stated?
- Does rounding of nutrients meet requirements?
- Is the format correct (i.e., full, simplified, or tabular)?
- Are claims supported by the numbers?
- Is the "servings per container" accurate and not "varied," if the product bears a net weight?
- Do bone-in products indicate percent bone?
- For bone-in products, is the "serving size X servings per X" statement accurate? Bone/inedible portion is not included in the nutrition information.
- Safe Handling Instructions (SHI) ( 9 CFR 317.2(l), 381.125(b))
- Are the current SHI included when necessary?
- If the SHI are modified in accordance with regulations, are there specific handling instructions on the label to support the modification?
|USDA/FSIS Label Submission Form 7234-1
- Is the product amenable to the FMIA or PPIA?
- Does the product contain at least 2% cooked or 3% or more raw meat or poultry?
- Is the product for human consumption or a certified pet food?
- Is the approval (application) form submission complete, i.e., form completely filled out, with the required number of copies? [Generally 2 copies are needed; however, 3 copies are needed for export/import labels and labels with Child Nutrition, and organic/animal production claims.]
- Is the submission legible, and does the product formula have percent or weights that are totaled at the bottom?
- Does the submission provide a size for the PDP and total available labeling space?
- Does the processing procedure support any claims/statements made on the label?
- Is the product smoked, and is the source of smoke indicated (e.g., Hickory)?
- Is the product sliced, ground, formed, etc.?
- Is the product dried? -- is the MPR provided?
- If a cooking temperature is provided, is it appropriate?
- Is a percent pick-up of solution/breading/coating stated?
- Is the product Ready to Eat (RTE) or not RTE (nRTE)? Is an explanation provided for nRTE products that appear to be RTE?
- Does the formula match the ingredients statement? Tips:
- Chicken is not chicken breast meat
- Chicken meat is not chicken tender
- Chicken tender is not chicken tenderloin
- Beef is not veal
- Pork trimmings are not bacon
- Angus is not Black Angus
- Is the formula presented in the same units adding to "100%" or all in pounds (not a mix of pounds and ounces)?
Back to Top
| Common Mistakes on Label Submissions
Back to Top
- No sublisting of multi-ingredient components on the label
- Percent restricted ingredients not provided or supported in submission (e.g., the percent of fat in the product is required for some ingredients)
- Binders in the solution pumped in meat or poultry products are not included in product names/qualifiers
- Order of predominance of ingredients is wrong
- Geographic claims and styles not supported by data
- Nutrition claims not supported by data or permitted by regulations
- Not enough copies of submission forms
- Submission is not legible (labels or application)
- Reason for a temporary label approval is not supported by required information (see below)
- Product name prominence/letter size conflict with requirements
- Meaningful terms/claims are not validated on the application, e.g., #1 seller of franks in the West is not supported by data
Temporary Approval Requests ( 9 CFR 317.4/ 317.9, 381.132)
- Specify the problem that has caused the need for a temporary label
- If the reason is a formula change, provide new nutrition profile
- Specifically list ALL ingredients in the product formulation and NOT on the label
- Additional information required by the Federal meat/poultry inspection regulations for granting a temporary:
- support that the label error does not misrepresent the product
- support that the label error does not pose any health, safety or dietary problems
- support that denial of the temporary approval would create undue economic hardship
- support that granting the approval does not give the manufacturer an unfair competitive advantage
Back to Top
|Common Abbreviations in Comments on Label Submissions
Back to Top
- IS - Ingredients Statement
- PN - Product Name
- NF - Nutrition Facts
- SS or S/S - Serving Size
- S/C, SC or S Per - Servings per Container
- RACC - Reference Amount Customarily Consumed
- NW or Net Wt - Net weight, usually size, spacing or location problems
- HS - Handling statement
- SL - Signature (Address) Line
- OOP - Order of Predominance in the ingredients statement
- RTE - Ready-to-eat
- NRTE --Not ready-to-eat
- MPR - Moisture protein ratio
- HRI - Hotel, Restaurant, Institution
|Additional Information Sources
Need additional information? Contact the Agency's Labeling and Program Delivery Division which provides guidance, policies and access to the Federal meat and poultry inspection regulations.
Back to Top