![]() |
FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION
SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, DC 20250-3700 |
Printer Friendly (PDF) version
Progress Report on Salmonella Testing of Raw Meat and
Poultry Products,
1998-2000
The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued the Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems; Final Rule on July 25, 1996: Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 144, pp. 38805-38989 (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/fr/haccp_rule.htm). To verify that industry Pathogen Reduction/HACCP (PR/HACCP) systems are effective in controlling the contamination of raw meat and poultry products with disease-causing bacteria, the PR/HACCP rule sets Salmonella performance standards that slaughter establishments and establishments that produce raw ground products must meet. These product-specific limits on Salmonella became effective in large establishments on January 26, 1998; in small establishments, on January 25, 1999; and in very small establishments, on January 25, 2000. FSIS verifies that establishments are meeting the standards by having federal inspection personnel collect randomly selected product samples and send them to FSIS laboratories for Salmonella analysis, according to procedures described in Appendix E of the PR/HACCP final rule: Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 144, pp. 38917-38928 (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/fr/haccp_rule.htm).
The Salmonella performance standards are based on the prevalence of Salmonella as determined from the agency’s nationwide microbial baseline studies (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/baseline/contents.htm) conducted before PR/HACCP was implemented. Raw products currently covered by performance standards are carcasses of cows/bulls, steers/heifers, market hogs, and broilers; and ground beef, ground chicken, and ground turkey. The performance standards are expressed in terms of the maximum number of Salmonella-positive samples that are allowed per sample set. The number of samples in a sample set varies by product, and the maximum number of positive samples allowed in a set provides an 80% probability of passing when the establishment is operating at the standard. An initial sample set or a set that follows a passed set is designated code "A"; other codes represent sample sets collected from establishments targeted for follow-up testing following a failed set. Code "A" sample sets are collected at randomly selected establishments.
The data analyzed for this report are from code "A" sample sets. The laboratory results from follow-up testing resulting from failed "A" sample sets are not included because they represent biased test results. Presenting the "A" set data provides the most direct comparison to the baseline estimates that were used to establish the performance standards. Salmonella prevalence estimates are based on all "A" set samples collected during the indicated year, with no consideration given as to whether a sample is part of a complete or an incomplete set. The percentages of sample sets meeting the Salmonella performance standards are based on "A" sets that were completed during the specified year, as defined by the collect date of the last sample in the sample set.
Salmonella prevalence in most of the product categories continues to be lower after PR/HACCP implementation than in agency baseline studies and surveys conducted before PR/HACCP (Table 1). Differences in pre- versus post-HACCP Salmonella prevalence may reflect changes due to HACCP implementation. After three years of testing in large establishments under HACCP, results show that the average Salmonella prevalence in code "A" samples is lower than the performance standard in all seven product categories. After two years of testing in small establishments under HACCP, the average Salmonella prevalence in code "A" samples is lower than the performance standard in all product categories except market hogs. The Salmonella prevalence in code "A" market hog carcass samples from small establishments decreased from 18.0% in calendar year (CY) 1999 to 7.7% in CY 2000, compared to the 8.7% performance standard. The limited data available for very small establishments after approximately eight months of testing under HACCP show that the Salmonella prevalence is lower than the performance standard in all product categories except cows and bulls (3.5% prevalence compared to the 2.7% performance standard).
The results of three years of testing show that the majority of completed code "A" sample sets meets the Salmonella performance standard (Table 2). Salmonella compliance for all sizes of establishments and all years combined is: 90.7% for broilers, 80.8% for market hogs, 82.7% for cows/bulls, 94.4% for steers/heifers, 89.6% for ground beef, 100.0% for ground chicken, and 89.4% for ground turkey.
Achieving a reduction in pathogens reduces the risk of illness. However, all segments of the food chain and consumers should continue to properly handle, cook, and store all meat, poultry, and other food products in order to guard against foodborne illness.
A more detailed description of this program and the presentation of test results are being prepared and will be submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal.
For More Information:
Table 1
Prevalence a of Salmonella in the PR/HACCP Verification
Testing Program
By Calendar Year, 1998 - 2000
"A" Sets
|
|
|
Large | Small | Very Small | All Sizes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 7,175 | 7.5% | 2,821 | 13.0% | 61 | 18.0% | 10,057 | 9.1% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 1,919 | 4.1% | 2,144 | 7.7% | 1,107 | 7.2% | 5,170 | 6.2% |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 173 | 0.6% | 1,593 | 2.1% | 229 | 3.5% | 1,995 | 2.2% |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 222 | 0.0% | 693 | 0.6% | 177 | 0.0% | 1,092 | 0.4% |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 1,373 | 5.4% | 21,065 | 3.4% | 10,406 | 2.7% | 32,844 | 3.3% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 169 | 12.4% | 233 | 15.0% | 12 | 8.3% | 414 | 13.8% |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 1,173 | 26.5% | 377 | 23.3% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,551 | 25.7% |
|
|
|
Large | Small | All Sizes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 4,530 | 9.3% | 2,238 | 15.6% | 6,768 | 11.4% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 973 | 1.8% | 950 | 18.0% | 1,923 | 9.8% |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 116 | 0.9% | 1,405 | 2.3% | 1,521 | 2.2% |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 272 | 0.4% | 510 | 0.2% | 782 | 0.3% |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 765 | 6.7% | 15,610 | 4.2% | 16,375 | 4.3% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 125 | 15.2% | 172 | 16.9% | 297 | 16.2% |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 759 | 33.1% | 291 | 27.8% | 1,050 | 31.6% |
|
|
|
Large | Small | All Sizes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 5,645 | 10.8% | 14 | 7.1% | 5,659 | 10.8% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 1,390 | 5.8% | 0 | 1,390 | 5.8% | |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 58 | 0.0% | 121 | 1.7% | 179 | 1.1% |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 214 | 0.0% | 0 | 214 | 0.0% | |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 1,125 | 4.9% | 171 | 16.4% | 1,296 | 6.4% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 24 | 4.2% | 0 | 24 | 4.2% | |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 591 | 36.5% | 0 | 591 | 36.5% | |
|
|
|
Large | Small | Very Small | All Sizes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos | # Samp | % Pos |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 17,350 | 9.1% | 5,073 | 14.1% | 61 | 18.0% | 22,484 | 10.2% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 4,282 | 4.1% | 3,094 | 10.9% | 1,107 | 7.2% | 8,483 | 7.0% |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 347 | 0.6% | 3,119 | 2.2% | 229 | 3.5% | 3,695 | 2.1% |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 708 | 0.1% | 1,203 | 0.4% | 177 | 0.0% | 2,088 | 0.3% |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 3,263 | 5.5% | 36,846 | 3.8% | 10,406 | 2.7% | 50,515 | 3.7% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 318 | 12.9% | 405 | 15.8% | 12 | 8.3% | 735 | 14.4% |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 2,523 | 30.8% | 668 | 25.3% | 1 | 0.0% | 3,192 | 29.7% |
a Prevalence estimates include all samples collected during the indicated calendar year.
Table 2
Percent of Sample Sets Meeting the Salmonella Performance Standards a
By Calendar Year, 1998 - 2000
"A" Sets
|
|
|
Large | Small | Very Small | All Sizes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 137 | 96.4% | 53 | 79.2% | 0 |
|
190 | 91.6% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 32 | 93.8% | 34 | 70.6% | 0 | 66 | 81.8% | |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 2 | 100.0% | 30 | 83.3% | 0 | 32 | 84.4% | |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 3 | 100.0% | 8 | 87.5% | 0 | 11 | 90.9% | |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 27 | 81.5% | 344 | 91.9% | 75 | 90.7% | 446 | 91.0% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 3 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 15 | 93.3% | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 17 | 88.2% | |
|
|
|
Large | Small | All Sizes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 111 | 91.0% | 40 | 85.0% | 151 | 89.4% |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 26 | 100.0% | 12 | 50.0% | 38 | 84.2% |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 2 | 100.0% | 17 | 76.5% | 19 | 78.9% |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 3 | 100.0% | 3 | 100.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 21 | 85.7% | 252 | 87.3% | 273 | 87.2% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 2 | 100.0% | 3 | 100.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 18 | 94.4% | 5 | 80.0% | 23 | 91.3% |
|
|
|
Large | Small | All Sizes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 77 | 90.9% | 0 | 77 | 90.9% | |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 16 | 68.8% | |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 9 | 88.9% | 0 | 9 | 88.9% | |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 7 | 85.7% | 0 | 7 | 85.7% | |
|
|
|
Large | Small | Very Small | All Sizes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Perf Std (%) | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass | # Sets | % Pass |
| Broilers | 20.0 | 325 | 93.2% | 93 | 81.7% | 0 | 418 | 90.7% | |
| Market Hogs | 8.7 | 74 | 90.5% | 46 | 65.2% | 0 | 120 | 80.8% | |
| Cows/Bulls | 2.7 | 5 | 100.0% | 47 | 80.9% | 0 | 52 | 82.7% | |
| Steers/Heifers | 1.0 | 7 | 100.0% | 11 | 90.9% | 0 | 18 | 94.4% | |
| Ground Beef | 7.5 | 57 | 84.2% | 596 | 89.9% | 75 | 90.7% | 728 | 89.6% |
| Ground Chicken | 44.6 | 5 | 100.0% | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 10 | 100.0% | |
| Ground Turkey | 49.9 | 40 | 92.5% | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 47 | 89.4% | |
a Includes sample sets that completed during the indicated calendar year (sample sets may have started during an earlier year).
|
Learn more about the
Office of Public Health
and Science. |