This document is provided to further explain
reasons why a label was modified or returned
after evaluation by a staff member of the
Labeling and Program Delivery Division (LPDD).
Each reason corresponds to a number that
will be placed on a label or label
application that is either modified or
rejected. While LPPD has endeavored to be
comprehensive, this list is not all
inclusive. There are certain reasons for
modifications or rejection, reasons that are
very specific and cannot be generalized. In
these situations, the reason will be noted
on the label application or in a return
letter.
Key abbreviations and terms used
throughout this document:
X –number or amount
***** - product name
XXX – specific regulation citation
Label Application and Label
Presentation: (9
CFR 317.4(c)) and Instructions for
Preparations for
FSIS Form 7234.1
- Two copies of the label must be
submitted. A copy of the label must be
attached to each application. To
assemble the submission: Staple a copy
of the label to each application. Then
staple the applications together. Refer
to the Instructions for Preparation of
FSIS Form 7234-1.
- Labeling submitted for sketch
approval must be a printer’s proof or
reasonable facsimile that clearly shows
all mandatory features. If this text is
to be printed on a master label, provide
a copy of the master label.
- To facilitate the processing of the
submission, please put the application
on top of each label. Refer to the
Instructions for Preparation of FSIS
Form 7234-1.
- The label applications are not
legible. Please resubmit legible copies.
- Complete all applicable boxes on the
FSIS Form 7234-1. Refer to the
Instructions for Preparation of FSIS
Form 7234-1.
- The product formula is incomplete.
Provide a complete product formula that
agrees with the ingredients statement.
- In the product formula, provide a
percent pick-up of solution based on the
meat component calculated as pounds
solution divided by pounds of raw meat
or poultry.
Product Name: (9
CFR 317.4(e) and
9 CFR 381.117,
Food Standards and Labeling Policy Book,
and
FSIS Directive 7220.1)
- Delete the term
“Marinated” or “Basted” from the product
name. The amount of solution in products
labeled as “marinated” or “basted” are
limited to 10% for red meat products, 8%
boneless poultry products and 3% bone-in
poultry products. Refer to the entry for
“marinated” in the FSIS Standards and
Labeling Policy Book.
- Correct the product name. See the
entry “*****” in the FSIS Food Standards
and Labeling Policy Book.
- Correct the product name because the
standard of identity for “******” is not
met. See 9 CFR 319, 381 subpart P or the
FSIS Food Standards and Labeling Policy
Book.
- Correct the product name. See FSIS
Directive 7220.1, Policy Memo 030A or
029.
- Correct the size of the product
name. The smallest letter in the product
name must be at least one-third the size
of the largest letter in the product
name. See FSIS Directive 7220.1, Policy
Memo 087A.
- Correct the size of the fanciful
name. The smallest letter in the
fanciful name must be at least one-third
the size of the largest letter in the
product name. See FSIS Directive 7220.1,
Policy Memo 087A.
- Correct the product name. The
product does not meet the regulatory
standard for “*****,” therefore, the
product name should be “Imitation
“*****.” See the entry “*****” in the 9
CFR 319.
- Correct the product name. The kind
of poultry must be identified in the
product name, that is, White Bean Chili
with Dark Chicken.” See 9 CFR
381.117(d).
- Binders such as modified food starch
or carrageenan, are not permitted in
whole muscle red meat products.
- Provide the percent of maltodextrin
in the purchased seasoning and provide
the dextrose equivalency (DE). The
maltodextrin may not exceed 1% of the
finished product. If the DE is 5 or
greater the maltodextrin may not exceed
the percentage of the finished product.
Maltodextrin may not be a direct
addition to formula.
- Country Sausage must be made in the
country. See 9 CFR 317.8(b) (2).
- Indicate on the application how this
product meets the standard for “*****.”
Refer to the Food Standards and Labeling
Policy Book for established standards
and the listing of ingredients that
enable the product to meet the standard
for this product.
- Correct the placement of the
ingredient statement on the label.
Nonspecific product like “loaves” needs
a descriptive name or need to be
followed immediately by the ingredient
statement. A product labeled “Olive
Loaf” is a non-specific product.
Therefore, it must be descriptively
labeled or the name must be followed by
the ingredient statement. See 9 CFR
317.2(e) and the entry “Nonspecific Meat
Food Products” in the FSIS Standards and
Labeling Policy Book.
- Delete the honey claim. The product
must contain at least 3 percent honey.
See the entry “Honey Claims in Product”
in the FSIS Standards and Labeling
Policy Book.
- The product name does not agree with
the processing procedures.
- Qualify the use of the coating
contiguous to the product name. See the
entry “Coated With” in the FSIS
Standards and Labeling Policy Book.
- Based on the formula provided, the
raw meat picks up x% of its weight from
the seasoning solution. Therefore, a
containing statement must qualify the
product name. See FSIS Directive 7220.1,
Policy Memo 066C.
- The country of origin, for example,
“Product of Canada,” must appear
immediately below the product name. See
9 CFR 327.14(b) (1).
- The use of a geographic reference on
labeling needs to comply with 9 CFR
317.8(b)(1). However, if the product is
made in a locality other than that
referenced in the product name, the name
should be qualified by the word “brand,”
in the same size and style lettering as
the geographic term and accompanied with
a prominent qualifying statement
identifying the country, state,
territory or locality in which the
product was actually prepared, that is,
Danish Brand Ham, Made in USA. See 9 CFR
317.8(b) (1) and the FSIS Food Standards
and Labeling Policy Book entry for
Geographic Style and related terms.
- Correct the product name to add
“Textured Vegetable Protein (TVP)”
because the ratio of meat or poultry
meat to TVP is less than 7:1. See the
entry “Textured Vegetable Protein (TVP)
Products - Fresh Meat or Poultry Meat
Ratios” in the FSIS Food Standards and
Labeling Policy Book.
- The use of “Textured Vegetable
Protein (TVP)” needs to be qualified to
the product name (that is, Textured
Vegetable Protein added” because the
ratio of meat or poultry meat to TVP is
less than 10:1. See the entry “Textured
Vegetable Protein (TVP) Products - Fresh
Meat or Poultry Meat Ratios” in the FSIS
Food Standards and Labeling Policy Book.
- For Sausage Pizza, the use of pizza
topping containing sausage and textured
vegetable protein (TVP) must provide the
percent of meat and TVP. The meat=TVP
ratio determines if TVP should be in the
product name.
Ingredients: (9
CFR 317.2(f),
381.118,
424.21 and
FSIS Directive 7220.1)
- The term “Ingredients:” must precede
the declaration of the ingredients. See
9 CFR 317.2(c) (2).
- The ingredient statement is not
legible. See 9 CFR 317.2(b).
- Multi-ingredients in the ingredients
statement (for example, soy sauce)
should be sublisted in the ingredient
statement.
- Garlic powder and onion powder are
not spices and should be declared in the
ingredient statement as “garlic powder”
or “onion powder” or as “flavorings.”
See 9 CFR 317.2(f)(1)(i)(A) or 9 CFR
381.118(2)(c)(1).
- “And/or” labeling of major
components of the product is not
acceptable. See FSIS Directive 7220.1,
Policy Memo 072.
- The source of milk (for example,
cow’s milk) for the Romano cheese should
be identified in the sublisting of the
cheese in the ingredients statement. See
21 CFR 133.183 (f)(1)
- The ingredient statement does not
agree with the formula. Provide an
ingredient statement that agrees with
the formula. See 9 CFR 317.2(f)(1) or 9
CFR 381.118(a)(1).
- Provide a simple product formula
that proves the order of predominance of
the ingredient statement. See 9 CFR
317.2 (f)(1) or 9 CFR 381.118 (a)(1).
- Correct the order of predominance in
the ingredient statement. See 9 CFR
317.2 (f)(1) meat and 9 CFR 381.118
(a)(1) poultry.
- Correct the declaration of the meat
component in the ingredient statement.
The correct declaration for the
ingredient statement is “Beef Tenderloin
Containing up to X% of a Solution of ….”
See FSIS Directive 7220.1 Policy Memo
066C.
- Correct the placement of the
containing statement. The containing
statement, “Contains up to X% of a
Solution,” must appear contiguous to the
product name.
- Paprika is not permitted in fresh
sausage.
- Paprika and extractives of paprika
are not permitted in this product. See 9
CFR 424.23 and the FSIS Food Standards
and Labeling Policy Book entry for
“Paprika.”
- Correct the size of the “containing
statement.” The smallest letter in the
“containing statement” must be at least
¼ the size of the largest letter in the
product name. See FSIS Directive 7220.1
Policy Memos, 042, 044,066C and 084A.
- Products containing seasoning
packets must declare their presence in
the product name, that is, “Cooked Pork
Meatball with Seasoning Packet
Included.” See Directive 7220.1 Policy
Memo 099.
- In the ingredient statement,
identify the ham component by its common
and usual name, that is, “Ham Water
Added” or “Ham and Water Product, X % of
weight are added ingredients.” See 9 CFR
319.104 (d).
- The product name must be qualified
to indicate the presence of the caramel
coloring, that is, Caramel Coloring
Added.” See entry for "Caramel Color" in
the FSIS Food Standards and Labeling
Policy Book.
- Identify the source of protein in
the hydrolyzed vegetable protein, that
is, “hydrolyzed corn protein.” See FSIS
Directive 7237.1.
- Correct the declaration of
ingredients in the ingredient statement.
Specifically, the ingredient statement
does not comply with FSIS Directive
7237.1 Revision 1. This directive
requires the full disclosure of the
ingredients in all Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) regulated foods
identified on the labels of meat and
poultry products, for example, soy sauce
or seasoning.
- On the application, identify the
spices used in the product.
- Sublist “***** powder” in the
ingredients statement on the label for
example= chili powder (chili pepper,
cumin and turmeric).
Restricted Ingredients: (
9 CFR 424.21 and
FSIS Directive 7220.1)
- The sodium erythorbate amount is
excessive. Sodium erythorbate is limited
to 547 parts per million of the meat
block in comminuted product.
- Sodium erythorbate is approved for
use only in cured meat products. Since
this product is not cured that is,
contain sodium nitrite or nitrate, the
sodium erythorbate must be removed from
the product. See 9 CFR 424.21
- The sodium nitrite level is
excessive. Sodium nitrite is limited to
156 parts per million of the meat block
in comminuted product. See 9 CFR 424.21.
- The sodium nitrite level is
insufficient. Cured comminuted meat
product should have at least 120 parts
per million of sodium nitrite. See 9 CFR
424.21.
- Non-amenable species, such as
ostrich, cannot be cured unless an
amenable species, such as beef, pork, or
poultry, is added to the product. The
product must contain 2% cooked poultry
in the total product.
- Minimum fat content of the raw
product must be disclosed on the
application to determine antioxidant
compliance. See 9 CFR 424.21
- Minimum fat content and the percent
antioxidants in the seasoning must be
disclosed on the application to
determine antioxidant compliance. See 9
CFR 424.21.
- Based on the information provided,
the percent of antioxidants in the
product are excessive. The antioxidants
are limited to X % of the fat content of
the product. See 9 CFR 424.21.
- Antioxidants and synergist are not
permitted in cooked sausage. See 9 CFR
424.21.
- The binder, that is, soy protein
concentrate, level is excessive. Binders
are limited to 3.5 percent of the
finished product weight. See 9 CFR
424.21.
- The sodium phosphate level is
excessive. Sodium phosphate is limited
to 5000 parts per million in the total
product. See 9 CFR 424.21.
Signature Line: (9
CFR 317.2 (g) or
381.116
- Correct the placement of
the Signature Line on the information
panel. When on an information panel,
this feature must be contiguous to the
ingredient statement. See 9 CFR 317.2(m)
or 381.116(c) (2) (ii).
- A qualifying statement needs to
precede the signature line because the
product is not produced at the address
shown on the label. See 9 CFR 317.2(g)
(1) or 381.116(c) (2) (ii)
- Include the zip code in the address
line. See 9 CFR 317.2 (g) (1).
Net Weight: (9 CFR 317.2(h) and
381.121)
- Correct the net weight size and spacing.
See 9 CFR 317.2(h) or
381.121(c). Correct the placement of the
net weight statement. See 9 CFR 317.2(h)
(3) or 381.121(c) (1). See 9 CFR
317.2(h) or 381.121(c).
- Correct the net weight declaration.
The quantitative declaration should be
preceded by the phrase “NET WT.”
- Correct the placement of the net
weight declaration. The net weight
should appear in the lower 30% of the
principal display panel. See 9 CFR
317.2(h).
- Correct the net weight declaration.
Net weight between 1 and 4 pounds or 1
pint and 1 gallon must be expressed as a
dual declaration, that is, Net Wt. 32 OZ
(2 lb). See 9 CFR 317.2(h) (4) or
381.12(c) (5).
- The size of the net weight statement
must comply with 9 CFR 317.2(h) or
318.121(c). The size of the net weight
statement is based on the size of the
principal display panel, not the label.
Legend and Est and Plant
Number:
9 CFR 312.2, 317.2(i),
381.96,
381.123
- The inspection legend is incorrect.
The Federal inspection legend must
comply with the illustration in 9 CFR
312.2 or 381.96.
- The inspection legend is incorrect.
Poultry products should bear the mark of
inspection illustrated in 9 CFR 381.96.
- The wrong inspection legend is on
the label. The Federal inspection legend
for red meat products must comply with
the illustration in 9 CFR 312.2.
- The wording in the inspection legend
is incorrect. The Federal inspection
legend must comply with the illustration
in 9 CFR 312.2 or 381.96.
- Correct the placement of the Federal
inspection legend. The legend must
appear on the principal display panel.
See 9 CFR 317.2(c) (5).
- Only one Federal inspection legend
may appear on product sold at retail
(that is directly to consumers).
- The Federal inspection legend is
missing from the label. See 9 CFR 312.2
or 381.96.
Handling Statement: 9 CFR 317.2
(k) or
381.125 (a)
- Correct the placement of the handling
statement (for example, Keep Refrigerated or
Keep Frozen). The handling statement must
appear on the principal display panel. See 9 CFR
317.2(k) or 381.125(a).
- Correct the handling statement. The
handling statement on the label should
agree with the label, agree with the
processing procedures in block 9 on the
label application. For example, if the
product is refrigerated before it leaves
the establishment that manufactured the
product, the label should bear “Keep
Refrigerated.” See 9 CFR 317.2 (k).
Safe Handling Statement:
9 CFR 317.2(l) or
381.125
- Safe Handling Instructions (SHI)
are missing from the label. SHI are
mandatory for all the raw or not
ready to eat meat and poultry
uncooked products. See 9 CFR
317.2(l) or 9 CFR 381.125.
- Remove Safe Handling
Instructions (SHI) from the label.
SHI are not needed on ready to eat
meat and poultry products. See 9 CFR
317.2(l) or 9 CFR 381.125.
- The heading “Safe Handling
Instructions” must be larger than
1/16 inch. All other lettering in
the safe handling instruction block
has to be a minimum of 1/16 inch.
See 9 CFR 317.2(l) or 9 CFR 381.125.
- The size of the text in the SHI
is too small. All text in the Safe
Handling Instructions block must be
at least 1/16 inch. See 9 CFR
317.2(l) or 9 CFR 381.125.
- Safe Handling Instructions must
appear in one color on a solid
background.
- Safe Handling Instructions must
have a border.
- Provide a copy of the Safe
Handling Instructions with each
label as part of the label
application.
Nutrition Facts:
9 CFR 317.300-400,
381.400-500
- Correct the Nutrition Facts
format. The format must comply
with 9 CFR 317.309(d) or
381.409(d).
- The core nutrients and
percent daily values in the
Nutrition Facts must be in bold
print. See 9 CFR 317.309(d) (1)
(iii) or 381.409(d) (1) (iii).
- The serving size must be in
a discrete unit that most
closely approximates the
reference amount customarily
consumed for example, 85 grams
for an entrée without sauce. See
9 CFR 317.309(b)(4)&(5) or 9 CFR
317.409(b)(4)&(5).
- The quantitative data must
be present in the Nutrition
Facts panel when the labels are
presented for approval. See 9
CFR 317.309(d)(7) or 9 CFR
317.409(d)(7).
- Remove the nutrition claim
from the labeling. The claim
does not comply with the
regulation. See 9 CFR 317.XXX or
381.XXX.
- When making a nutrition
claim, that is, 97% Fat Free,
the product must be
nutritionally labeled. See 9 CFR
317.313(b) or 9 CFR 381.413(b).
- Based on the amount of
labeling space available, that
is, greater than 40 square
inches, the tabular format and
abbreviations are not permitted.
See 9 CFR 317.309(d) and
381.409(d)
- On the application, provide
a rationale for the serving size
used. The serving size of some
of the products can be declared
by multiple reference amounts,
that is, mixed dish not
measurable by a cup or entrée
with sauce. In addition, provide
the expected cook yield. See 9
CFR 317.309(b)(7) or ( CFR
381.409(b)(7).
- Remove the nutrition claim
from the labeling. The claim
does not comply with the
regulation. See 9 CFR 317.XXX or
381.XXX.
Amenability:
- Upon reviewing the
formulation of this product,
we have determined that it
is not amenable to the
Poultry Products Inspection
Act. Generally, product
should contain at least 2%
cooked poultry meat and 3%
raw poultry meat.
- Upon reviewing the
formulation of this product,
we have determined that it
is not amenable to the
Federal Meat Inspection Act.
Generally, product should
contain at least 2% or more
cooked red meat and more
than 3% raw red meat.
Temporary
Approval:
9 CFR 317.4,
381.132
- Provide the specific
reason for temporary
approval on the
application form; for
example removing
dextrose from the
product formulation or
replacing sodium
erythorbate with sodium
ascorbate. Reasons such
as “changing the product
formula or “removing
ingredients from the
label” are not specific
enough and will be
returned for more
information.
- When requesting an
extension of a current
temporary approval,
explain on application
what new circumstance
has happened since last
temporary was granted.
Also specify details of
the 4 conditions in 9
CFR 317.4(f) (1) or
381.132(f) (1).
- The 4 conditions of
9 CFR 317.4(f) (1) or
381.132(f) (1) have to
be met prior to
receiving a temporary
approval. Specify
details of all
conditions on
application. Refer to
temporary approval
handout. Or see
information below:
- (f)(1)
Consistent with the
requirements of this
section, temporary
approval for the use
of a final label or
other final labeling
that may otherwise
be deemed deficient
in some particular
may be granted by
the Labeling and
Program Delivery
Division. Temporary
approvals may be
granted for a period
not to exceed 180
calendar days, under
the following
conditions:
- The proposed
labeling would
not misrepresent
the product;
(ii) The use of
the labeling
would not
present any
potential
health, safety,
or dietary
problems to the
consumer;
(iii) Denial of
the request
would create
undue economic
hardship; and
(iv) An unfair
competitive
advantage would
not result from
the granting of
the temporary
approval.
Generic
- Many of these
labels can be
generically approved
based on previously
approved labels.
Refer to 9 CFR
317.5(b) (9)or
381.133(b) (9)
|